Your details
Name
Email
Phone
Delivery address
Address
Post code
Country
Card details
Card type
VISA
AmEx
Mastercard
Card number
Security code
Name on card
Buy it!
Making things look nice
First things first, so let’s start by adding some defaults to our form by resetting the margins and paddings of the elements and adding a default font to the page:
html, body, h1, form, fieldset, legend, ol, li {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
background: #ffffff;
color: #111111;
font-family: Georgia, ""Times New Roman"", Times, serif;
padding: 20px;
}
Next we are going to style the form element that is wrapping our fields:
form#payment {
background: #9cbc2c;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
padding: 20px;
width: 400px;
}
We will also remove the border from the fieldset and apply some bottom margin to it. Using the :last-of-type pseudo-class, we remove the bottom margin of the last fieldset — there is no need for it:
form#payment fieldset {
border: none;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
form#payment fieldset:last-of-type {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
Next we’ll make the legends big and bold, and we will also apply a light-green text-shadow, to add that little extra special detail:
form#payment legend {
color: #384313;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: bold;
padding-bottom: 10px;
text-shadow: 0 1px 1px #c0d576;
}
Our legends are looking great, but how about adding a clear indication of how many steps our form has? Instead of adding that manually to every legend, we can use automatically generated counters.
To add a counter to an element, we have to use either the :before or :after pseudo-elements to add content via CSS. We will follow these steps:
create a counter using the counter-reset property on the form element
call the counter with the content property (using the same name we’ve created before)
with the counter-incremet property, indicate that for each element that matches our selector, that counter will be increased by 1
form#payment > fieldset > legend:before {
content: ""Step "" counter(fieldsets) "": "";
counter-increment: fieldsets;
}
Finally, we need to change the style of the legend that is part of the radio buttons group, to make it look like a label:
form#payment fieldset fieldset legend {
color: #111111;
font-size: 13px;
font-weight: normal;
padding-bottom: 0;
}
Styling the lists
For our list elements, we’ll just add some nice rounded corners and semi-transparent border and background. Because we are using RGBa colors, we should provide a fallback for browsers that don’t support them (that comes before the RBGa color). For the nested lists, we will remove these properties because they would be overlapping:
form#payment ol li {
background: #b9cf6a;
background: rgba(255,255,255,.3);
border-color: #e3ebc3;
border-color: rgba(255,255,255,.6);
border-style: solid;
border-width: 2px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
line-height: 30px;
list-style: none;
padding: 5px 10px;
margin-bottom: 2px;
}
form#payment ol ol li {
background: none;
border: none;
float: left;
}
Form controls
Now we only need to style our labels, inputs and the button element.
All our labels will look the same, with the exception of the one for the radio elements. We will float them to the left and give them a width.
For the credit card type labels, we will add an icon as the background, and override some of the properties that aren’t necessary. We will be using the attribute selector to specify the background image for each label — in this case, we use the for attribute of each label.
To add an extra user-friendly detail, we’ll add a cursor: pointer to the radio button labels on the :hover state, so the user knows that he can simply click them to select that option.
form#payment label {
float: left;
font-size: 13px;
width: 110px;
}
form#payment fieldset fieldset label {
background:none no-repeat left 50%;
line-height: 20px;
padding: 0 0 0 30px;
width: auto;
}
form#payment label[for=visa] {
background-image: url(visa.gif);
}
form#payment label[for=amex] {
background-image: url(amex.gif);
}
form#payment label[for=mastercard] {
background-image: url(mastercard.gif);
}
form#payment fieldset fieldset label:hover {
cursor: pointer;
}
Almost there! Now onto the input elements. Here we want to match all inputs, except for the radio ones, and the textarea. For that we will use the negation pseudo-class (:not()). With it we can target all input elements except for the ones with type of radio.
We will also make sure to add some :focus styles and add the appropriate styling for the radio inputs:
form#payment input:not([type=radio]),
form#payment textarea {
background: #ffffff;
border: none;
-moz-border-radius: 3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 3px;
-khtml-border-radius: 3px;
border-radius: 3px;
font: italic 13px Georgia, ""Times New Roman"", Times, serif;
outline: none;
padding: 5px;
width: 200px;
}
form#payment input:not([type=submit]):focus,
form#payment textarea:focus {
background: #eaeaea;
}
form#payment input[type=radio] {
float: left;
margin-right: 5px;
}
And finally we come to our submit button. To it, we will just add some nice typography and text-shadow, align it to the center of the form and give it some background colors for its different states:
form#payment button {
background: #384313;
border: none;
-moz-border-radius: 20px;
-webkit-border-radius: 20px;
-khtml-border-radius: 20px;
border-radius: 20px;
color: #ffffff;
display: block;
font: 18px Georgia, ""Times New Roman"", Times, serif;
letter-spacing: 1px;
margin: auto;
padding: 7px 25px;
text-shadow: 0 1px 1px #000000;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
form#payment button:hover {
background: #1e2506;
cursor: pointer;
}
And that’s it! See the completed form.
This form will not look the same on every browser. Internet Explorer and Opera don’t support border-radius (at least not for now); the new input types are rendered as just normal inputs on some browsers; and some of the most advanced CSS, like the counter, :last-of-type or text-shadow are not supported on some browsers. But that doesn’t mean you can’t use them right now, and simplify your development process. My gift to you!",2009,Inayaili de León Persson,inayailideleon,2009-12-03T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2009/have-a-field-day-with-html5-forms/,code
240,My CSS Wish List,"I love Christmas. I love walking around the streets of London, looking at the beautifully decorated windows, seeing the shiny lights that hang above Oxford Street and listening to Christmas songs.
I’m not going to lie though. Not only do I like buying presents, I love receiving them too. I remember making long lists that I would send to Father Christmas with all of the Lego sets I wanted to get. I knew I could only get one a year, but I would spend days writing the perfect list.
The years have gone by, but I still enjoy making wish lists. And I’ll tell you a little secret: my mum still asks me to send her my Christmas list every year.
This time I’ve made my CSS wish list. As before, I’d be happy with just one present.
Before I begin…
… this list includes:
things that don’t exist in the CSS specification (if they do, please let me know in the comments – I may have missed them);
others that are in the spec, but it’s incomplete or lacks use cases and examples (which usually means that properties haven’t been implemented by even the most recent browsers).
Like with any other wish list, the further down I go, the more unrealistic my expectations – but that doesn’t mean I can’t wish. Some of the things we wouldn’t have thought possible a few years ago have been implemented and our wishes fulfilled (think multiple backgrounds, gradients and transformations, for example).
The list
Cross-browser implementation of font-size-adjust
When one of the fall-back fonts from your font stack is used, rather than the preferred (first) one, you can retain the aspect ratio by using this very useful property. It is incredibly helpful when the fall-back fonts are smaller or larger than the initial one, which can make layouts look less polished.
What font-size-adjust does is divide the original font-size of the fall-back fonts by the font-size-adjust value. This preserves the x-height of the preferred font in the fall-back fonts. Here’s a simple example:
p {
font-family: Calibri, ""Lucida Sans"", Verdana, sans-serif;
font-size-adjust: 0.47;
}
In this case, if the user doesn’t have Calibri installed, both Lucida Sans and Verdana will keep Calibri’s aspect ratio, based on the font’s x-height. This property is a personal favourite and one I keep pointing to.
Firefox supported this property from version three. So far, it’s the only browser that does. Fontdeck provides the font-size-adjust value along with its fonts, and has a handy tool for calculating it.
More control over overflowing text
The text-overflow property lets you control text that overflows its container. The most common use for it is to show an ellipsis to indicate that there is more text than what is shown. To be able to use it, the container should have overflow set to something other than visible, and white-space: nowrap:
div {
white-space: nowrap;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
}
This, however, only works for blocks of text on a single line. In the wish list of many CSS authors (and in mine) is a way of defining text-overflow: ellipsis on a block of multiple text lines. Opera has taken the first step and added support for the -o-ellipsis-lastline property, which can be used instead of ellipsis. This property is not part of the CSS3 spec, but we could certainly make good use of it if it were…
WebKit has -webkit-line-clamp to specify how many lines to show before cutting with an ellipsis, but support is patchy at best and there is no control over where the ellipsis shows in the text. Many people have spent time wrangling JavaScript to do this for us, but the methods used are very processor intensive, and introduce a JavaScript dependency.
Indentation and hanging punctuation properties
You might notice a trend here: almost half of the items in this list relate to typography. The lack of fine-grained control over typographical detail is a general concern among designers and CSS authors. Indentation and hanging punctuation fall into this category.
The CSS3 specification introduces two new possible values for the text-indent property: each-line; and hanging. each-line would indent the first line of the block container and each line after a forced line break; hanging would invert which lines are affected by the indentation.
The proposed hanging-punctuation property would allow us to specify whether opening and closing brackets and quotes should hang outside the edge of the first and last lines. The specification is still incomplete, though, and asks for more examples and use cases.
Text alignment and hyphenation properties
Following the typographic trend of this list, I’d like to add better control over text alignment and hyphenation properties. The CSS3 module on Generated Content for Paged Media already specifies five new hyphenation-related properties (namely: hyphenate-dictionary; hyphenate-before and hyphenate-after; hyphenate-lines; and hyphenate-character), but it is still being developed and lacks examples.
In the text alignment realm, the new text-align-last property allows you to define how the last line of a block (or a line just before a forced break) is aligned, if your text is set to justify. Its value can be: start; end; left; right; center; and justify. The text-justify property should also allow you to have more control over text set to text-align: justify but, for now, only Internet Explorer supports this.
calc()
This is probably my favourite item in the list: the calc() function. This function is part of the CSS3 Values and Units module, but it has only been implemented by Firefox (4.0). To take advantage of it now you need to use the Mozilla vendor code, -moz-calc().
Imagine you have a fluid two-column layout where the sidebar column has a fixed width of 240 pixels, and the main content area fills the rest of the width available. This is how you could create that using -moz-calc():
#main {
width: -moz-calc(100% - 240px);
}
Can you imagine how many hacks and headaches we could avoid were this function available in more browsers? Transitions and animations are really nice and lovely but, for me, it’s the ability to do the things that calc() allows you to that deserves the spotlight and to be pushed for implementation.
Selector grouping with -moz-any()
The -moz-any() selector grouping has been introduced by Mozilla but it’s not part of any CSS specification (yet?); it’s currently only available on Firefox 4.
This would be especially useful with the way HTML5 outlines documents, where we can have any number of variations of several levels of headings within numerous types of containers (think sections within articles within sections…).
Here is a quick example (copied from the Mozilla blog post about the article) of how -moz-any() works. Instead of writing:
section section h1, section article h1, section aside h1,
section nav h1, article section h1, article article h1,
article aside h1, article nav h1, aside section h1,
aside article h1, aside aside h1, aside nav h1, nav section h1,
nav article h1, nav aside h1, nav nav h1, {
font-size: 24px;
}
You could simply write:
-moz-any(section, article, aside, nav)
-moz-any(section, article, aside, nav) h1 {
font-size: 24px;
}
Nice, huh?
More control over styling form elements
Some are of the opinion that form elements shouldn’t be styled at all, since a user might not recognise them as such if they don’t match the operating system’s controls. I partially agree: I’d rather put the choice in the hands of designers and expect them to be capable of deciding whether their particular design hampers or improves usability.
I would say the same idea applies to font-face: while some fear designers might go crazy and litter their web pages with dozens of different fonts, most welcome the freedom to use something other than Arial or Verdana.
There will always be someone who will take this freedom too far, but it would be useful if we could, for example, style the default Opera date picker:
tags
*
* @tags (optional)
*/
CSSDOC includes a standard for documenting bug fixes and hacks, colours, versioning and copyright information, amongst other important bits of data.
I know this isn’t a CSS feature request per se; rather, it’s just me pointing you at something that is usually overlooked but that could contribute towards keeping style sheets easier to maintain and to hand over to new developers.
Final notes
I understand that if even some of these were implemented in browsers now, it would be a long time until all vendors were up to speed. But if we don’t talk about them and experiment with what’s available, then it will definitely never happen.
Why haven’t I mentioned better browser support for existing CSS3 properties? Because that would be the same as adding chocolate to your Christmas wish list – you don’t need to ask, everyone knows you want it.
The list could go on. There are dozens of other things I would love to see integrated in CSS or further developed. These are my personal favourites: some might be less useful than others, but I’ve wished for all of them at some point.
Part of the research I did while writing this article was asking some friends what they would add to their lists; other than a couple of items I already had in mine, everything else was different. I’m sure your list would be different too. So tell me, what’s on your CSS wish list?",2010,Inayaili de León Persson,inayailideleon,2010-12-03T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2010/my-css-wish-list/,code
37,JavaScript Modules the ES6 Way,"JavaScript admittedly has plenty of flaws, but one of the largest and most prominent is the lack of a module system: a way to split up your application into a series of smaller files that can depend on each other to function correctly.
This is something nearly all other languages come with out of the box, whether it be Ruby’s require, Python’s import, or any other language you’re familiar with. Even CSS has @import! JavaScript has nothing of that sort, and this has caused problems for application developers as they go from working with small websites to full client-side applications. Let’s be clear: it doesn’t mean the new module system in the upcoming version of JavaScript won’t be useful to you if you’re building smaller websites rather than the next Instagram.
Thankfully, the lack of a module system will soon be a problem of the past. The next version of JavaScript, ECMAScript 6, will bring with it a full-featured module and dependency management solution for JavaScript. The bad news is that it won’t be landing in browsers for a while yet – but the good news is that the specification for the module system and how it will look has been finalised. The even better news is that there are tools available to get it all working in browsers today without too much hassle. In this post I’d like to give you the gift of JS modules and show you the syntax, and how to use them in browsers today. It’s much simpler than you might think.
What is ES6?
ECMAScript is a scripting language that is standardised by a company called Ecma International. JavaScript is an implementation of ECMAScript. ECMAScript 6 is simply the next version of the ECMAScript standard and, hence, the next version of JavaScript. The spec aims to be fully comfirmed and complete by the end of 2014, with a target initial release date of June 2015. It’s impossible to know when we will have full feature support across the most popular browsers, but already some ES6 features are landing in the latest builds of Chrome and Firefox. You shouldn’t expect to be able to use the new features across browsers without some form of additional tooling or library for a while yet.
The ES6 module spec
The ES6 module spec was fully confirmed in July 2014, so all the syntax I will show you in this article is not expected to change. I’ll first show you the syntax and the new APIs being added to the language, and then look at how to use them today. There are two parts to the new module system. The first is the syntax for declaring modules and dependencies in your JS files, and the second is a programmatic API for loading in modules manually. The first is what most people are expected to use most of the time, so it’s what I’ll focus on more.
Module syntax
The key thing to understand here is that modules have two key components. First, they have dependencies. These are things that the module you are writing depends on to function correctly. For example, if you were building a carousel module that used jQuery, you would say that jQuery is a dependency of your carousel. You import these dependencies into your module, and we’ll see how to do that in a minute. Second, modules have exports. These are the functions or variables that your module exposes publicly to anything that imports it. Using jQuery as the example again, you could say that jQuery exports the $ function. Modules that depend on and hence import jQuery get access to the $ function, because jQuery exports it.
Another important thing to note is that when I discuss a module, all I really mean is a JavaScript file. There’s no extra syntax to use other than the new ES6 syntax. Once ES6 lands, modules and files will be analogous.
Named exports
Modules can export multiple objects, which can be either plain old variables or JavaScript functions. You denote something to be exported with the export keyword:
export function double(x) {
return x + x;
};
You can also store something in a variable then export it. If you do that, you have to wrap the variable in a set of curly braces.
var double = function(x) {
return x + x;
}
export { double };
A module can then import the double function like so:
import { double } from 'mymodule';
double(2); // 4
Again, curly braces are required around the variable you would like to import. It’s also important to note that from 'mymodule' will look for a file called mymodule.js in the same directory as the file you are requesting the import from. There is no need to add the .js extension.
The reason for those extra braces is that this syntax lets you export multiple variables:
var double = function(x) {
return x + x;
}
var square = function(x) {
return x * x;
}
export { double, square }
I personally prefer this syntax over the export function …, but only because it makes it much clearer to me what the module exports. Typically I will have my export {…} line at the bottom of the file, which means I can quickly look in one place to determine what the module is exporting.
A file importing both double and square can do so in just the way you’d expect:
import { double, square } from 'mymodule';
double(2); // 4
square(3); // 9
With this approach you can’t easily import an entire module and all its methods. This is by design – it’s much better and you’re encouraged to import just the functions you need to use.
Default exports
Along with named exports, the system also lets a module have a default export. This is useful when you are working with a large library such as jQuery, Underscore, Backbone and others, and just want to import the entire library. A module can define its default export (it can only ever have one default export) like so:
export default function(x) {
return x + x;
}
And that can be imported:
import double from 'mymodule';
double(2); // 4
This time you do not use the curly braces around the name of the object you are importing. Also notice how you can name the import whatever you’d like. Default exports are not named, so you can import them as anything you like:
import christmas from 'mymodule';
christmas(2); // 4
The above is entirely valid.
Although it’s not something that is used too often, a module can have both named exports and a default export, if you wish.
One of the design goals of the ES6 modules spec was to favour default exports. There are many reasons behind this, and there is a very detailed discussion on the ES Discuss site about it. That said, if you find yourself preferring named exports, that’s fine, and you shouldn’t change that to meet the preferences of those designing the spec.
Programmatic API
Along with the syntax above, there is also a new API being added to the language so you can programmatically import modules. It’s pretty rare you would use this, but one obvious example is loading a module conditionally based on some variable or property. You could easily import a polyfill, for example, if the user’s browser didn’t support a feature your app relied on. An example of doing this is:
if(someFeatureNotSupported) {
System.import('my-polyfill').then(function(myPolyFill) {
// use the module from here
});
}
System.import will return a promise, which, if you’re not familiar, you can read about in this excellent article on HTMl5 Rocks by Jake Archibald. A promise basically lets you attach callback functions that are run when the asynchronous operation (in this case, System.import), is complete.
This programmatic API opens up a lot of possibilities and will also provide hooks to allow you to register callbacks that will run at certain points in the lifetime of a module. Those hooks and that syntax are slightly less set in stone, but when they are confirmed they will provide really useful functionality. For example, you could write code that would run every module that you import through something like JSHint before importing it. In development that would provide you with an easy way to keep your code quality high without having to run a command line watch task.
How to use it today
It’s all well and good having this new syntax, but right now it won’t work in any browser – and it’s not likely to for a long time. Maybe in next year’s 24 ways there will be an article on how you can use ES6 modules with no extra work in the browser, but for now we’re stuck with a bit of extra work.
ES6 module transpiler
One solution is to use the ES6 module transpiler, a compiler that lets you write your JavaScript using the ES6 module syntax (actually a subset of it – not quite everything is supported, but the main features are) and have it compiled into either CommonJS-style code (CommonJS is the module specification that NodeJS and Browserify use), or into AMD-style code (the spec RequireJS uses). There are also plugins for all the popular build tools, including Grunt and Gulp.
The advantage of using this transpiler is that if you are already using a tool like RequireJS or Browserify, you can drop the transpiler in, start writing in ES6 and not worry about any additional work to make the code work in the browser, because you should already have that set up already. If you don’t have any system in place for handling modules in the browser, using the transpiler doesn’t really make sense. Remember, all this does is convert ES6 module code into CommonJS- or AMD-compliant JavaScript. It doesn’t do anything to help you get that code running in the browser, but if you have that part sorted it’s a really nice addition to your workflow. If you would like a tutorial on how to do this, I wrote a post back in June 2014 on using ES6 with the ES6 module transpiler.
SystemJS
Another solution is SystemJS. It’s the best solution in my opinion, particularly if you are starting a new project from scratch, or want to use ES6 modules on a project where you have no current module system in place. SystemJS is a spec-compliant universal module loader: it loads ES6 modules, AMD modules, CommonJS modules, as well as modules that just add a variable to the global scope (window, in the browser).
To load in ES6 files, SystemJS also depends on two other libraries: the ES6 module loader polyfill; and Traceur. Traceur is best accessed through the bower-traceur package, as the main repository doesn’t have an easy to find downloadable version. The ES6 module load polyfill implements System.import, and lets you load in files using it. Traceur is an ES6-to-ES5 module loader. It takes code written in ES6, the newest version of JavaScript, and transpiles it into ES5, the version of JavaScript widely implemented in browsers. The advantage of this is that you can play with the new features of the language today, even though they are not supported in browsers. The drawback is that you have to run all your files through Traceur every time you save them, but this is easily automated. Additionally, if you use SystemJS, the Traceur compilation is done automatically for you.
All you need to do to get SystemJS running is to add a
When you load the page, app.js will be asynchronously loaded. Within app.js, you can now use ES6 modules. SystemJS will detect that the file is an ES6 file, automatically load Traceur, and compile the file into ES5 so that it works in the browser. It does all this dynamically in the browser, but there are tools to bundle your application in production, so it doesn’t make a lot of requests on the live site. In development though, it makes for a really nice workflow.
When working with SystemJS and modules in general, the best approach is to have a main module (in our case app.js) that is the main entry point for your application. app.js should then be responsible for loading all your application’s modules. This forces you to keep your application organised by only loading one file initially, and having the rest dealt with by that file.
SystemJS also provides a workflow for bundling your application together into one file.
Conclusion
ES6 modules may be at least six months to a year away (if not more) but that doesn’t mean they can’t be used today. Although there is an overhead to using them now – with the work required to set up SystemJS, the module transpiler, or another solution – that doesn’t mean it’s not worthwhile. Using any module system in the browser, whether that be RequireJS, Browserify or another alternative, requires extra tooling and libraries to support it, and I would argue that the effort to set up SystemJS is no greater than that required to configure any other tool. It also comes with the extra benefit that when the syntax is supported in browsers, you get a free upgrade. You’ll be able to remove SystemJS and have everything continue to work, backed by the native browser solution.
If you are starting a new project, I would strongly advocate using ES6 modules. It is a syntax and specification that is not going away at all, and will soon be supported in browsers. Investing time in learning it now will pay off hugely further down the road.
Further reading
If you’d like to delve further into ES6 modules (or ES6 generally) and using them today, I recommend the following resources:
ECMAScript 6 modules: the final syntax by Axel Rauschmayer
Practical Workflows for ES6 Modules by Guy Bedford
ECMAScript 6 resources for the curious JavaScripter by Addy Osmani
Tracking ES6 support by Addy Osmani
ES6 Tools List by Addy Osmani
Using Grunt and the ES6 Module Transpiler by Thomas Boyt
JavaScript Modules and Dependencies with jspm by myself
Using ES6 Modules Today by Guy Bedford",2014,Jack Franklin,jackfranklin,2014-12-03T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2014/javascript-modules-the-es6-way/,code
49,Universal React,"One of the libraries to receive a huge amount of focus in 2015 has been ReactJS, a library created by Facebook for building user interfaces and web applications.
More generally we’ve seen an even greater rise in the number of applications built primarily on the client side with most of the logic implemented in JavaScript. One of the main issues with building an app in this way is that you immediately forgo any customers who might browse with JavaScript turned off, and you can also miss out on any robots that might visit your site to crawl it (such as Google’s search bots). Additionally, we gain a performance improvement by being able to render from the server rather than having to wait for all the JavaScript to be loaded and executed.
The good news is that this problem has been recognised and it is possible to build a fully featured client-side application that can be rendered on the server. The way in which these apps work is as follows:
The user visits www.yoursite.com and the server executes your JavaScript to generate the HTML it needs to render the page.
In the background, the client-side JavaScript is executed and takes over the duty of rendering the page.
The next time a user clicks, rather than being sent to the server, the client-side app is in control.
If the user doesn’t have JavaScript enabled, each click on a link goes to the server and they get the server-rendered content again.
This means you can still provide a very quick and snappy experience for JavaScript users without having to abandon your non-JS users. We achieve this by writing JavaScript that can be executed on the server or on the client (you might have heard this referred to as isomorphic) and using a JavaScript framework that’s clever enough handle server- or client-side execution. Currently, ReactJS is leading the way here, although Ember and Angular are both working on solutions to this problem.
It’s worth noting that this tutorial assumes some familiarity with React in general, its syntax and concepts. If you’d like a refresher, the ReactJS docs are a good place to start.
Getting started
We’re going to create a tiny ReactJS application that will work on the server and the client. First we’ll need to create a new project and install some dependencies. In a new, blank directory, run:
npm init -y
npm install --save ejs express react react-router react-dom
That will create a new project and install our dependencies:
ejs is a templating engine that we’ll use to render our HTML on the server.
express is a small web framework we’ll run our server on.
react-router is a popular routing solution for React so our app can fully support and respect URLs.
react-dom is a small React library used for rendering React components.
We’re also going to write all our code in ECMAScript 6, and therefore need to install BabelJS and configure that too.
npm install --save-dev babel-cli babel-preset-es2015 babel-preset-react
Then, create a .babelrc file that contains the following:
{
""presets"": [""es2015"", ""react""]
}
What we’ve done here is install Babel’s command line interface (CLI) tool and configured it to transform our code from ECMAScript 6 (or ES2015) to ECMAScript 5, which is more widely supported. We’ll need the React transforms when we start writing JSX when working with React.
Creating a server
For now, our ExpressJS server is pretty straightforward. All we’ll do is render a view that says ‘Hello World’. Here’s our server code:
import express from 'express';
import http from 'http';
const app = express();
app.use(express.static('public'));
app.set('view engine', 'ejs');
app.get('*', (req, res) => {
res.render('index');
});
const server = http.createServer(app);
server.listen(3003);
server.on('listening', () => {
console.log('Listening on 3003');
});
Here we’re using ES6 modules, which I wrote about on 24 ways last year, if you’d like a reminder. We tell the app to render the index view on any GET request (that’s what app.get('*') means, the wildcard matches any route).
We now need to create the index view file, which Express expects to be defined in views/index.ejs:
My App
Hello World
Finally, we’re ready to run the server. Because we installed babel-cli earlier we have access to the babel-node executable, which will transform all your code before running it through node. Run this command:
./node_modules/.bin/babel-node server.js
And you should now be able to visit http://localhost:3003 and see ‘Hello World’ right there:
Building the React app
Now we’ll build the React application entirely on the server, before adding the client-side JavaScript right at the end. Our app will have two routes, / and /about which will both show a small amount of content. This will demonstrate how to use React Router on the server side to make sure our React app plays nicely with URLs.
Firstly, let’s update views/index.ejs. Our server will figure out what HTML it needs to render, and pass that into the view. We can pass a value into our view when we render it, and then use EJS syntax to tell it to output that data. Update the template file so the body looks like so:
<%- markup %>
Next, we’ll define the routes we want our app to have using React Router. For now we’ll just define the index route, and not worry about the /about route quite yet. We could define our routes in JSX, but I think for server-side rendering it’s clearer to define them as an object. Here’s what we’re starting with:
const routes = {
path: '',
component: AppComponent,
childRoutes: [
{
path: '/',
component: IndexComponent
}
]
}
These are just placed at the top of server.js, after the import statements. Later we’ll move these into a separate file, but for now they are fine where they are.
Notice how I define first that the AppComponent should be used at the '' path, which effectively means it matches every single route and becomes a container for all our other components. Then I give it a child route of /, which will match the IndexComponent. Before we hook these routes up with our server, let’s quickly define components/app.js and components/index.js. app.js looks like so:
import React from 'react';
export default class AppComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
Welcome to my App
{ this.props.children }
);
}
}
When a React Router route has child components, they are given to us in the props under the children key, so we need to include them in the code we want to render for this component. The index.js component is pretty bland:
import React from 'react';
export default class IndexComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
);
}
}
Server-side routing with React Router
Head back into server.js, and firstly we’ll need to add some new imports:
import React from 'react';
import { renderToString } from 'react-dom/server';
import { match, RoutingContext } from 'react-router';
import AppComponent from './components/app';
import IndexComponent from './components/index';
The ReactDOM package provides react-dom/server which includes a renderToString method that takes a React component and produces the HTML string output of the component. It’s this method that we’ll use to render the HTML from the server, generated by React. From the React Router package we use match, a function used to find a matching route for a URL; and RoutingContext, a React component provided by React Router that we’ll need to render. This wraps up our components and provides some functionality that ties React Router together with our app. Generally you don’t need to concern yourself about how this component works, so don’t worry too much.
Now for the good bit: we can update our app.get('*') route with the code that matches the URL against the React routes:
app.get('*', (req, res) => {
// routes is our object of React routes defined above
match({ routes, location: req.url }, (err, redirectLocation, props) => {
if (err) {
// something went badly wrong, so 500 with a message
res.status(500).send(err.message);
} else if (redirectLocation) {
// we matched a ReactRouter redirect, so redirect from the server
res.redirect(302, redirectLocation.pathname + redirectLocation.search);
} else if (props) {
// if we got props, that means we found a valid component to render
// for the given route
const markup = renderToString(
Welcome to my App
{ this.props.children }
);
}
}
You can now click between the pages to navigate. However, everytime we do so the requests hit the server. Now we’re going to make our final change, such that after the app has been rendered on the server once, it gets rendered and managed in the client, providing that snappy client-side app experience.
Client-side rendering
First, we’re going to make a small change to views/index.ejs. React doesn’t like rendering directly into the body and will give a warning when you do so. To prevent this we’ll wrap our app in a div:
<%- markup %>
I’ve also added in a script tag to build.js, which is the file we’ll generate containing all our client-side code.
Next, create client-render.js. This is going to be the only bit of JavaScript that’s exclusive to the client side. In it we need to pull in our routes and render them to the DOM.
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import { Router } from 'react-router';
import { routes } from './routes';
import createBrowserHistory from 'history/lib/createBrowserHistory';
ReactDOM.render(
!
Whoa! First spacer GIFs and now ? This really is the future! The image above will only load for users without JavaScript support. Now all we need to do is send JavaScript in there to get the textContent of the element, then we can alter the image source before handing it to the DOM for parsing.
Here’s an example of that working … unless you’re using Internet Explorer.
Internet Explorer doesn’t retain the content of elements. As soon as it’s parsed, it considers it an empty element. FANKS INTERNET EXPLORER. This is why some solutions do this:
so JavaScript can still get at the URL via the data-src attribute. However, repeating stuff isn’t great. Surely we can do better than that.
A dirty, dirty hack
Thankfully, I managed to come up with a solution, and by me, I mean someone cleverer than me. Pornel’s solution uses , but surely we don’t need that.
Now, before we look at this, I can’t stress how dirty it is. It’s so dirty that if you’ve seen it, schools will refuse to employ you.
example above, we can get the text content of the comment pretty easily.
Hurrah! But wait… Some browsers are sometimes downloading the image, even with JavaScript enabled. Notably Firefox. Huh?
Images are downloaded in comments now? What?
No. What we’re seeing here is the effect of speculative parsing. Here’s what’s happening:
While the browser is parsing the script, it parses the rest of the document. This is usually a good thing, as it can download subsequent images and scripts without waiting for the script to complete. The problem here is we create an unbalanced tree.
An unbalanced tree, yesterday.
In this case, the browser must throw away its speculative parsing and reparse from the end of the
And there we have it. We can now prevent images loading for users with JavaScript, but we can still get at the markup.
We’re still creating an unbalanced tree and there’s a performance impact in that. However, the parser won’t have got far by the time our script executes, so the impact is small. Unbalanced trees are more of a concern for external scripts; a lot of parsing can happen by the time the script has downloaded and parsed.
Using dirtiness to create responsive images
Now all we need to do is give each of our dirty scripts a class name, then JavaScript can pick them up, grab the markup from the comment and decide what to do with the images.
This technique isn’t exclusively useful for responsive images. It could also be used to delay images loading until they’ve scrolled into view. But to do that you’ll need a bulletproof way of detecting when elements are in view. This involves getting the height of the viewport, which is extremely unreliable on mobile devices.
Here’s a hastily thrown together example showing how it can be used for responsive images.
I adjust the end of the image URLs conditionally depending on the result of media queries. This is done on page load, and on resize.
I’m using regular expressions to alter the URLs. Using regex to deal with HTML is usually a sign of insanity, but parsing it with the browser’s DOM parser would trigger the download of images before we change the URLs. My implementation currently requires double-quoted image URLs, because I’m lazy. Wanna fight about it?
Media querying via JavaScript
Jeremy Keith used document.documentElement.clientWidth in his example, which is great as a proof of concept, but unfortunately is rather unreliable across mobile devices.
Thankfully, standards are coming to the rescue with window.matchMedia, which lets us provide a media query string and get a boolean result. There’s even a great polyfill for browsers that don’t support it (as long as they support media queries in CSS).
I didn’t go with that for three reasons:
I’d like to keep media queries in the CSS file, if possible.
I wanted something a little lighter to keep things speedy while resizing.
It’s just not dirty enough yet.
To make things ultra-dirty, I add a test element to the page with a specific class, let’s say media-test. Then, I control the width of it using media queries in my CSS file:
@media all and (min-width: 640px) {
.media-test {
width: 1px;
}
}
@media all and (min-width: 926px) {
.media-test {
width: 2px;
}
}
The JavaScript part changes the URL suffix depending on the width of media-test. I’m using a min-width media query, but you can use others such as pixel-ratio to detect high DPI displays. Basically, it’s a hacky way for CSS to set a value that can be picked up by JavaScript. It means the bit that signals changes to the images sits with the rest of the responsive code, without duplication.
Also, phwoar, dirty!
The API
I threw a script together to demonstrate the technique. I’m not particularly attached to it, I’m not even sure I like it, but here’s the API:
responsiveGallery({
// Class name of dirty script element(s) to target
scriptClass: 'dirty-gallery-script',
// Class name for our test element
testClass: 'dirty-gallery-test',
// The initial suffix of URLs, the bit that changes.
initialSuffix: '-mobile.jpg',
// A map of suffixes, for each width of 'dirty-gallery-test'
suffixes: {
'1': '-desktop.jpg',
'2': '-large-desktop.jpg',
'3': '-mobile-retina.jpg'
}
});
The API can cover individual images or multiple galleries at once. In the example I gave at the start of the article I make two calls to the API, one for both galleries, and one for the single image above the video reviews. They’re separate calls because they respond slightly differently.
The future
Hopefully, we’ll get a proper solution to this soon. My favourite suggestion is the element that Bruce Lawson covers.
Unfortunately, we’re nowhere near that yet, and I’d still rather have my media queries stay in CSS. Perhaps the source elements could be skipped if they’re display:none; then they could have class names and be controlled via CSS. Sigh.
Well, I’m tired of writing now and I’m sure you’re tired of reading. I realize what I’ve presented is a yet another dirty hack to the responsive image problem (perhaps the dirtiest?) and may be completely unfeasible in professional situations. But isn’t that the true spirit of Christmas?
No.",2011,Jake Archibald,jakearchibald,2011-12-08T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2011/adaptive-images-for-responsive-designs-again/,ux
127,Showing Good Form,"Earlier this year, I forget exactly when (it’s been a good year), I was building a client site that needed widgets which look like this (designed, incidentally, by my erstwhile writing partner, Cameron Adams):
Building this was a challenge not just in CSS, but in choosing the proper markup – how should such a widget be constructed?
Mmm … markup
It seemed to me there were two key issues to deal with:
The function of the interface is to input information, so semantically this is a form, therefore we have to find a way of building it using form elements: fieldset, legend, label and input
We can’t use a table for layout, even though that would clearly be the easiest solution!
Abusing tables for layout is never good – physical layout is not what table semantics mean. But even if this data can be described as a table, we shouldn’t mix forms markup with non-forms markup, because of the behavioral impact this can have on a screen reader:
To take a prominent example, the screen reader JAWS has a mode specifically for interacting with forms (cunningly known as “forms mode”). When running in this mode its output only includes relevant elements – legends, labels and form controls themselves. Any other kind of markup – like text in a previous table cell, a paragraph or list in between – is simply ignored. The user in this situation would have to switch continually in and out of forms mode to hear all the content. (For more about this issue and some test examples, there’s a thread at accessify forum which wanders in that direction.)
One further issue for screen reader users is implied by the design: the input fields are associated together in rows and columns, and a sighted user can visually scan across and down to make those associations; but a blind user can’t do that. For such a user the row and column header data will need to be there at every axis; in other words, the layout should be more like this:
And constructed with appropriate semantic markup to convey those relationships. By this point the selection of elements seems pretty clear: each row is a fieldset, the row header is a legend, and each column header is a label, associated with an input.
Here’s what that form looks like with no CSS:
And here’s some markup for the first row (with most of the attributes removed just to keep this example succinct):
Match points
Win
Draw
Lose
Played
The span inside each legend is because legend elements are highly resistant to styling! Indeed they’re one of the most stubborn elements in the browsers’ vocabulary. Oh man … how I wrestled with the buggers … until this obvious alternative occurred to me! So the legend element itself is just a container, while all the styling is on the inner span.
Oh yeah, there was some CSS too
I’m not gonna dwell too much on the CSS it took to make this work – this is a short article, and it’s all there in the demo [demo page, style sheet]
But I do want to touch on the most interesting bit – where we get from a layout with headers on every row, to one where only the top row has headers – or at least, so it appears to graphical browsers. For screen readers, as we noted, we need those headers on every row, so we should employ some cunning CSS to partly negate their visual presence, without removing them from the output.
The core styling for each label span is like this:
label span
{
display:block;
padding:5px;
line-height:1em;
background:#423221;
color:#fff;
font-weight:bold;
}
But in the rows below the header they have these additional rules:
fieldset.body label span
{
padding:0 5px;
line-height:0;
position:relative;
top:-10000em;
}
The rendered width of the element is preserved, ensuring that the surrounding label is still the same width as the one in the header row above, and hence a unified column width is preserved all the way down. But the element effectively has no height, and so it’s effectively invisible. The styling is done this way, rather than just setting the height to zero and using overflow:hidden, because to do that would expose an unrelated quirk with another popular screen reader! (It would hide the output from Window Eyes, as shown in this test example at access matters.)
The finished widget
It’s an intricate beast allright! But after all that we do indeed get the widget we want:
Demo page
Style sheet
It’s not perfect, most notably because the legends have to have a fixed width; this can be in em to allow for text scaling, but it still doesn’t allow the content to break into multiple lines. It also doesn’t look quite right in Safari; and some CSS hacking was needed to make it look right in IE6 and IE7.
Still it worked well enough for the purpose, and satisfied the client completely. And most of all it re-assured me in my faith – that there’s never any need to abuse tables for layout. (Unless of course you think this content is a table anyway, but that’s another story!)",2006,James Edwards,jamesedwards,2006-12-11T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2006/showing-good-form/,ux
97,Making Modular Layout Systems,"For all of the advantages the web has with distribution of content, I’ve always lamented the handiness of the WYSIWYG design tools from the print publishing world. When I set out to redesign my personal website, I wanted to have some of the same abilities that those tools have, laying out pages how I saw fit, and that meant a flexible system for dealing with imagery.
Building on some of the CSS that Eric Meyer employed a few years back on the A List Apart design, I created a set of classes to use together to achieve the variety I was after. Employing multiple classes isn’t a new technique, but most examples aren’t coming at this from strictly editorial and visual perspectives; I wanted to have options to vary my layouts depending on content.
If you want to skip ahead, you can view the example first.
Laying the Foundation
We need to be able to map out our page so that we have predictable canvas, and then create a system of image sizes that work with it. For the sake of this article, let’s use a simple uniform 7-column grid, consisting of seven 100px-wide columns and 10px of space between each column, though you can use any measurements you want as long as they remain constant.
All of our images will have a width that references the grid column widths (in our example, 100px, 210px, 320px, 430px, 540px, 650px, or 760px), but the height can be as large as needed.
Once we know our images will all have one of those widths, we can setup our CSS to deal with the variations in layout. In the most basic form, we’re going to be dealing with three classes: one each that represent an identifier, a size, and a placement for our elements.
This is really a process of abstracting the important qualities of what you would do with a given image in a layout into separate classes, allowing you to quickly customize their appearance by combining the appropriate classes. Rather than trying to serve up a one-size-fits-all approach to styling, we give each class only one or two attributes and rely on the combination of classes to get us there.
Identifier
This specifies what kind of element we have: usually either an image (pic) or some piece of text (caption).
Size
Since we know how our grid is constructed and the potential widths of our images, we can knock out a space equal to the width of any number of columns. In our example, that value can be one, two, three, four, five, six, or seven.
Placement
This tells the element where to go. In our example we can use a class of left or right, which sets the appropriate floating rule.
Additions
I created a few additions that be tacked on after the “placement” in the class stack: solo, for a bit more space beneath images without captions, frame for images that need a border, and inset for an element that appears inside of a block of text. Outset images are my default, but you could easily switch the default concept to use inset images and create a class of outset to pull them out of the content columns.
The CSS
/* I D E N T I F I E R */
.pic p, .caption {
font-size: 11px;
line-height: 16px;
font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;
color: #666;
margin: 4px 0 10px;
}
/* P L A C E M E N T */
.left {float: left; margin-right: 20px;}
.right {float: right; margin-left: 20px;}
.right.inset {margin: 0 120px 0 20px;} /* img floated right within text */
.left.inset {margin-left: 230px;} /* img floated left within text */
/* S I Z E */
.one {width: 100px;}
.two {width: 210px;}
.three {width: 320px;}
.four {width: 430px;}
.five {width: 540px;}
.six {width: 650px;}
.seven {width: 760px;}
.eight {width: 870px;}
/* A D D I T I O N S */
.frame {border: 1px solid #999;}
.solo img {margin-bottom: 20px;}
In Use
You can already see how powerful this approach can be. If you want an image and a caption on the left to stretch over half of the page, you would use:
Caption goes here.
Or, for that same image with a border and no caption:
Caption goes here.
Caveats
Obviously there are some potential semantic hang-ups with these methods. While classes like pic and caption stem the tide a bit, others like left and right are tougher to justify. This is something that you have to decide for yourself; I’m fine with the occasional four or left class because I think there’s a good tradeoff. Just as a fully semantic solution to this problem would likely be imperfect, this solution is imperfect from the other side of the semantic fence. Additionally, IE6 doesn’t understand the chain of classes within a CSS selector (like .right.inset). If you need to support IE6, you may have to write a few more CSS rules to accommodate any discrepancies.
Opportunities
This is clearly a simple example, but starting with a modular foundation like this leaves the door open for opportunity. We’ve created a highly flexible and human-readable system for layout manipulation. Obviously, this is something that would need to be tailored to the spacing and sizes of your site, but the systematic approach is very powerful, especially for editorial websites whose articles might have lots of images of varying sizes. It may not get us fully to the flexibility of WYSIWYG print layouts, but methods like this point us in a direction of designs that can adapt to the needs of the content.
View the example: without grid and with grid.",2008,Jason Santa Maria,jasonsantamaria,2008-12-15T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2008/making-modular-layout-systems/,process
137,Cheating Color,"Have you ever been strapped to use specific colors outlined in a branding guide? Felt restricted because those colors ended up being too light or dark for the way you want to use them?
Here’s the solution: throw out your brand guide.
gasp!
OK, don’t throw it out. Just put it in a drawer for a few minutes.
Branding Guides be Damned
When dealing with color on screen, it’s easy to get caught up in literal values from hex colors, you can cheat colors ever so slightly to achieve the right optical value. This is especially prevalent when trying to bring a company’s identity colors to a screen design. Because the most important idea behind a brand guide is to help a company maintain the visual integrity of their business, consider hex numbers to be guidelines rather than law. Once you are familiar enough with the colors your company uses, you can start to flex them a bit, and take a few liberties.
This is a quick method for cheating to get the color you really want. With a little sleight of design, we can swap a color that might be part of your identity guidelines, with one that works better optically, and no one will be the wiser!
Color is a Wily Beast
This might be hard: You might have to break out of the idea that a color can only be made using one method. Color is fluid. It interacts and changes based on its surroundings. Some colors can appear lighter or darker based on what color they appear on or next to. The RGB gamut is additive color, and as such, has a tendency to push contrast in the direction that objects may already be leaning—increasing the contrast of light colors on dark colors and decreasing the contrast of light on light. Obviously, because we are talking about monitors here, these aren’t hard and fast rules.
Cheat and Feel Good About It
On a light background, when you have a large element of a light color, a small element of the same color will appear lighter.
Enter our fake company: Double Dagger. They manufacture footnotes. Take a look at Fig. 1 below. The logo (Double Dagger), rule, and small text are all #6699CC. Because the logo so large, we get a good sense of the light blue color. Unfortunately, the rule and small text beneath it feel much lighter because we can’t create enough contrast with such small shapes in that color.
Now take a look at Fig. 2. Our logo is still #6699CC, but now the rule and smaller text have been cheated to #4477BB, effectively giving us the same optical color that we used in the logo. You will find that we get a better sense of the light blue, and the added benefit of more contrast for our text. Doesn’t that feel good?
Conversely, when you have a large element of a dark color, a small element of the same color will appear darker.
Let’s look at Fig. 3 below. Double Dagger has decided to change its identity colors from blue to red. In Fig. 3, our logo, rule, and small text are all #330000, a very dark red. If you look at the rule and small text below the logo, you will notice that they seem dark enough to be confused with black. The dark red can’t be sustained by the smaller shapes. Now let’s look at Fig. 4. The logo is still #33000, but we’ve now cheated the rule and smaller text to #550000. This gives us a better sense of a red, but preserves the dark and moody direction the company has taken.
But we’ve only touched on color against a white background. For colors against a darker background, you may find lighter colors work fine, but darker colors need to be cheated a bit to the lighter side in order to reach a good optical equivalent. Take a look below at Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. Both use the same exact corresponding colors as Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 above, but now they are set against a dark background. Where the blue used in Fig. 1 above was too light for the smaller elements, we find it is just right for them in Fig. 5, and the darker blue we used in Fig. 2 has now proven too dark for a dark background, as evidenced in Fig. 6.
Your mileage may vary, and this may not be applicable in all situations, but consider it to be just another tool on your utility belt for dealing with color problems.",2006,Jason Santa Maria,jasonsantamaria,2006-12-23T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2006/cheating-color/,design
48,A Holiday Wish,"A friend and I were talking the other day about why clients spend more on toilet cleaning than design, and how the industry has changed since the mid-1990s, when we got our starts. Early in his career, my friend wrote a fine CSS book, but for years he has called himself a UX designer. And our conversation got me thinking about how I reacted to that title back when I first started hearing it.
“Just what this business needs,” I said to myself, “another phony expert.”
Okay, so I was wrong about UX, but my touchiness was not altogether unfounded. In the beginning, our industry was divided between freelance jack-of-all-trade punks, who designed and built and coded and hosted and Photoshopped and even wrote the copy when the client couldn’t come up with any, and snot-slick dot-com mega-agencies that blew up like Alice and handed out titles like impoverished nobles in the years between the world wars.
I was the former kind of designer, a guy who, having failed or just coasted along at a cluster of other careers, had suddenly, out of nowhere, blossomed into a web designer—an immensely curious designer slash coder slash writer with a near-insatiable lust to shave just one more byte from every image. We had modems back then, and I dreamed in sixteen colors. My source code was as pretty as my layouts (arguably prettier) and I hoovered up facts and opinions from newsgroups and bulletin boards as fast as any loudmouth geek could throw them. It was a beautiful life.
But soon, too soon, the professional digital agencies arose, buying loft buildings downtown, jacking in at T1 speeds, charging a hundred times what I did, and communicating with their clients in person, in large artfully bedecked rooms, wearing hand-tailored Barney’s suits and bringing back the big city bullshit I thought I’d left behind when I quit advertising to become a web designer.
Just like the big bad ad agencies of my early career, the new digital agencies stocked every meeting with a totem pole worth of ranks and titles. If the client brought five upper middle managers to the meeting, the agency did likewise. If fifteen stakeholders got to ask for a bigger logo, fifteen agency personnel showed up to take notes on the percentage of enlargement required.
But my biggest gripe was with the titles.
The bigger and more expensive the agency, the lousier it ran with newly invented titles. Nobody was a designer any more. Oh, no. Designer, apparently, wasn’t good enough. Designer was not what you called someone you threw that much money at.
Instead of designers, there were user interaction leads and consulting middleware integrators and bilabial experience park rangers and you name it. At an AIGA Miami event where I was asked to speak in the 1990s, I once watched the executive creative director of the biggest dot-com agency of the day make a presentation where he spent half his time bragging that the agency had recently shaved down the number of titles for people who basically did design stuff from forty-six to just twenty-three—he presented this as though it were an Einsteinian coup—and the other half of his time showing a film about the agency’s newly opened branch in Oslo. The Oslo footage was shot in December. I kept wondering which designer in the audience who lived in the constant breezy balminess of Miami they hoped to entice to move to dark, wintry Norway. But I digress.
Shortly after I viewed this presentation, the dot-com world imploded, brought about largely by the euphoric excess of the agencies and their clients. But people still needed websites, and my practice flourished—to the point where, in 1999, I made the terrifying transition from guy in his underwear working freelance out of his apartment to head of a fledgling design studio. (Note: you never stop working on that change.)
I had heard about experience design in the 1990s, but assumed it was a gig for people who only knew one font.
But sometime around 2004 or 2005, among my freelance and small-studio colleagues, like a hobbit in the Shire, I began hearing whispers in the trees of a new evil stirring. The fires of Mordor were burning. Web designers were turning in their HTML editing tools and calling themselves UXers.
I wasn’t sure if they pronounced it “uck-sir,” or “you-ex-er,” but I trusted their claims to authenticity about as far as I trusted the actors in a Doctor Pepper commercial when they claimed to be Peppers. I’m an UXer, you’re an UXer, wouldn’t you like to be an UXer too? No thanks, said I. I still make things. With my hands.
Such was my thinking. I may have earned an MFA at the end of some long-past period of soul confusion, but I have working-class roots and am profoundly suspicious of, well, everything, but especially of anything that smacks of pretense. I got exporting GIFs. I didn’t get how white papers and bullet points helped anybody do anything.
I was wrong. And gradually I came to know I was wrong. And before other members of my tribe embraced UX, and research, and content strategy, and the other airier consultant services, I was on board. It helped that my wife of the time was a librarian from Michigan, so I’d already bought into the cult of information architecture. And if I wasn’t exactly the seer who first understood how borderline academic practices related to UX could become as important to our medium and industry as our craft skills, at least I was down a lot faster than Judd Apatow got with feminism. But I digress.
I love the web and all the people in it. Today I understand design as a strategic practice above all. The promise of the web, to make all knowledge accessible to all people, won’t be won by HTML5, WCAG 2, and responsive web design alone.
We are all designers. You may call yourself a front-end developer, but if you spend hours shaving half-seconds off an interaction, that’s user experience and you, my friend, are a designer. If the client asks, “Can you migrate all my old content to the new CMS?” and you answer, “Of course we can, but should we?”, you are a designer. Even our users are designers. Think about it.
Once again, as in the dim dumb dot-com past, we seem to be divided by our titles. But, O, my friends, our varied titles are only differing facets of the same bright gem. Sisters, brothers, we are all designers. Love on! Love on!
And may all your web pages, cards, clusters, clumps, asides, articles, and relational databases be bright.",2014,Jeffrey Zeldman,jeffreyzeldman,2014-12-18T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2014/a-holiday-wish/,ux
103,Recession Tips For Web Designers,"For web designers, there are four keys to surviving bad economic times: do good work, charge a fair price, lower your overhead, and be sure you are communicating with your client. As a reader of 24 ways, you already do good work, so let’s focus on the rest.
I know something about surviving bad times, having started my agency, Happy Cog, at the dawn of the dot-com bust. Of course, the recession we’re in now may end up making the dot-com bust look like the years of bling and gravy. But the bust was rough enough at the time.
Bad times are hard on overweight companies and over-leveraged start-ups, but can be kind to freelancers and small agencies. Clients who once had money to burn and big agencies to help them burn it suddenly consider the quality of work more important than the marquee value of the business card. Fancy offices and ten people at every meeting are out. A close relationship with an individual or small team that listens is in.
Thin is in
If you were good in client meetings when you were an employee, print business cards and pick a name for your new agency. Once some cash rolls in, see an accountant.
If the one-person entrepreneur model isn’t you, it’s no problem. Form a virtual agency with colleagues who complement your creative, technical, and business skills. Athletics is a Brooklyn-based multi-disciplinary “art and design collective.” Talk about low overhead: they don’t have a president, a payroll, or a pension plan. But that hasn’t stopped clients like adidas, Nike, MTV, HBO, Disney, DKNY, and Sundance Channel from knocking on their (virtual) doors.
Running a traditional business is like securing a political position in Chicago: it costs a fortune. That’s why bad times crush so many companies. But you are a creature of the internets. You don’t need an office to do great work. I ran Happy Cog out of my apartment for far longer than anyone realized. My clients, when they learned my secret, didn’t care.
Keep it lean: if you can budget your incoming freelance money, you don’t have to pay yourself a traditional salary. Removing the overhead associated with payroll means more of the budget stays in your pocket, enabling you to price your projects competitively, while still within industry norms. (Underpricing is uncool, and clients who knowingly choose below-market-rate vendors tend not to treat those vendors with respect.)
Getting gigs
Web design is a people business. If things are slow, email former clients. If you just lost your job, email former agency clients with whom you worked closely to inform them of your freelance business and find out how they’re doing. Best practice: focus the email on wishing them a happy holiday and asking how they’re doing. Let your email signature file tell them you’re now the president of Your Name Design. Leading with the fact that you just lost your job may earn sympathy (or commiseration: the client may have lost her job, too) but it’s not exactly a sure-fire project getter.
The qualities that help you land a web design project are the same in good times or bad. Have a story to tell about the kind of services you offer, and the business benefits they provide. (If you design with web standards, you already have one great story line. What are the others?)
Don’t be shy about sharing your story, but don’t make it the focus of the meeting. The client is the focus. Before you meet her, learn as much as you can about her users, her business, and her competitors. At the very least, read her site’s About pages, and spend some quality time with Google.
Most importantly, go to the meeting knowing how much you don’t know. Arrive curious, and armed with questions. Maintain eye contact and keep your ears open. If a point you raise causes two people to nod at each other, follow up on that point, don’t just keep grinding through your Keynote presentation.
If you pay attention and think on your feet, it tells the potential client that they can expect you to listen and be flexible. (Clients are like unhappy spouses: they’re dying for someone to finally listen.) If you stick to a prepared presentation, it might send the message that you are inflexible or nervous or both. “Nervous” is an especially bad signal to send. It indicates that you are either dishonest or inexperienced. Neither quality invites a client to sign on. Web design is a people business for the client, too: they should feel that their interactions with you will be pleasant and illuminating. And that you’ll listen. Did I mention that?
Give it time
Securing clients takes longer and requires more effort in a recession. If two emails used to land you a gig, it will now take four, plus an in-person meeting, plus a couple of follow-up calls. This level of salesmanship is painful to geeks and designers, who would rather spend four hours kerning type or debugging a style sheet than five minutes talking business on the telephone. I know. I’m the same way. But we must overcome our natural shyness and inwardness if we intend not to fish our next meal out of a neighbor’s garbage can.
As a bonus, once the recession ends, your hard-won account management skills will help you take your business to the next level. By the time jobs are plentiful again, you may not want to work for anyone but yourself. You’ll be a captain of our industry. And talented people will be emailing to ask you for a job.",2008,Jeffrey Zeldman,jeffreyzeldman,2008-12-24T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2008/recession-tips-for-web-designers/,business
173,Real Fonts and Rendering: The New Elephant in the Room,"My friend, the content strategist Kristina Halvorson, likes to call content “the elephant in the room” of web design. She means it’s the huge problem that no one on the web development team or client side is willing to acknowledge, face squarely, and plan for.
A typical web project will pass through many helpful phases of research, and numerous beneficial user experience design iterations, while the content—which in most cases is supposed to be the site’s primary focus—gets handled haphazardly at the end. Hence, elephant in the room, and hence also artist Kevin Cornell’s recent use of elephantine imagery to illustrate A List Apart articles on the subject. But I digress.
Without discounting the primacy of the content problem, we web design folk have now birthed ourselves a second lumbering mammoth, thanks to our interest in “real fonts on the web“ (the unfortunate name we’ve chosen for the recent practice of serving web-licensed fonts via CSS’s decade-old @font-face declaration—as if Georgia, Verdana, and Times were somehow unreal).
For the fact is, even bulletproof and mo’ bulletproofer @font-face CSS syntax aren’t really bulletproof if we care about looks and legibility across browsers and platforms.
Hyenas in the Breakfast Nook
The problem isn’t just that foundries have yet to agree on a standard font format that protects their intellectual property. And that, even when they do, it will be a while before all browsers support that standard—leaving aside the inevitable politics that impede all standardization efforts. Those are problems, but they’re not the elephant. Call them the coyotes in the room, and they’re slowly being tamed.
Nor is the problem that workable, scalable business models (of which Typekit‘s is the most visible and, so far, the most successful) are still being shaken out and tested. The quality and ease of use of such services, their stability on heavily visited sites (via massively backed-up server clusters), and the fairness and sustainability of their pricing will determine how licensing and serving “real fonts” works in the short and long term for the majority of designer/developers.
Nor is our primary problem that developers with no design background may serve ugly or illegible fonts that take forever to load, or fonts that take a long time to download and then display as ordinary system fonts (as happens on, say, about.validator.nu). Ugliness and poor optimization on the web are nothing new. That support for @font-face in Webkit and Mozilla browsers (and for TrueType fonts converted to Embedded OpenType in Internet Explorer) adds deadly weapons to the non-designer’s toolkit is not the technology’s fault. JavaScript and other essential web technologies are equally susceptible to abuse.
Beauty is in the Eye of the Rendering Engine
No, the real elephant in the room—the thing few web developers and no “web font” enthusiasts are talking about—has to do with legibility (or lack thereof) and aesthetics (or lack thereof) across browsers and platforms. Put simply, even fonts optimized for web use (which is a whole thing: ask a type designer) will not look good in every browser and OS. That’s because every browser treats hinting differently, as does every OS, and every OS version.
Firefox does its own thing in both Windows and Mac OS, and Microsoft is all over the place because of its need to support multiple generations of Windows and Cleartype and all kinds of hardware simultaneously. Thus “real type” on a single web page can look markedly different, and sometimes very bad, on different computers at the same company. If that web page is your company’s, your opinion of “web fonts” may suffer, and rightfully. (The advantage of Apple’s closed model, which not everyone likes, is that it allows the company to guarantee the quality and consistency of user experience.)
As near as my font designer friends and I can make out, Apple’s Webkit in Safari and iPhone ignores hinting and creates its own, which Apple thinks is better, and which many web designers think of as “what real type looks like.” The forked version of Webkit in Chrome, Android, and Palm Pre also creates its own hinting, which is close to iPhone’s—close enough that Apple, Palm, and Google could propose it as a standard for use in all browsers and platforms. Whether Firefox would embrace a theoretical Apple and Google standard is open to conjecture, and I somehow have difficulty imagining Microsoft buying in—even though they know the web is more and more mobile, and that means more and more of their customers are viewing web content in some version of Webkit.
The End of Simple
There are ways around this ugly type ugliness, but they involve complicated scripting and sniffing—the very nightmares from which web standards and the simplicity of @font-face were supposed to save us. I don’t know that even mighty Typekit has figured out every needed variation yet (although, working with foundries, they probably will).
For type foundries, the complexity and expense of rethinking classic typefaces to survive in these hostile environments may further delay widespread adoption of web fonts and the resolution of licensing and formatting issues. The complexity may also force designers (even those who prefer to own) to rely on a hosted rental model simply to outsource and stay current with the detection and programming required.
Forgive my tears. I stand in a potter’s field of ideas like “Keep it simple,” by a grave whose headstone reads “Write once, publish everywhere.”",2009,Jeffrey Zeldman,jeffreyzeldman,2009-12-22T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2009/real-fonts-and-rendering/,design
305,CSS Writing Modes,"Since you may not have a lot of time, I’m going to start at the end, with the dessert.
You can use a little-known, yet important and powerful CSS property to make text run vertically. Like this.
Or instead of running text vertically, you can layout a set of icons or interface buttons in this way. Or, of course, with anything on your page.
The CSS I’ve applied makes the browser rethink the orientation of the world, and flow the layout of this element at a 90° angle to “normal”. Check out the live demo, highlight the headline, and see how the cursor is now sideways.
See the Pen Writing Mode Demo — Headline by Jen Simmons (@jensimmons) on CodePen.
The code for accomplishing this is pretty simple.
h1 {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
}
That’s all it takes to switch the writing mode from the web’s default horizontal top-to-bottom mode to a vertical right-to-left mode. If you apply such code to the html element, the entire page is switched, affecting the scroll direction, too.
In my example above, I’m telling the browser that only the h1 will be in this vertical-rl mode, while the rest of my page stays in the default of horizontal-tb.
So now the dessert course is over. Let me serve up this whole meal, and explain the the CSS Writing Mode Specification.
Why learn about writing modes?
There are three reasons I’m teaching writing modes to everyone—including western audiences—and explaining the whole system, instead of quickly showing you a simple trick.
We live in a big, diverse world, and learning about other languages is fascinating. Many of you lay out pages in languages like Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Or you might be inspired to in the future.
Using writing-mode to turn bits sideways is cool. This CSS can be used in all kinds of creative ways, even if you are working only in English.
Most importantly, I’ve found understanding Writing Modes incredibly helpful when understanding Flexbox and CSS Grid. Before I learned Writing Mode, I felt like there was still a big hole in my knowledge, something I just didn’t get about why Grid and Flexbox work the way they do. Once I wrapped my head around Writing Modes, Grid and Flexbox got a lot easier. Suddenly the Alignment properties, align-* and justify-*, made sense.
Whether you know about it or not, the writing mode is the first building block of every layout we create. You can do what we’ve been doing for 25 years – and leave your page set to the default left-to-right direction, horizontal top-to-bottom writing mode. Or you can enter a world of new possibilities where content flows in other directions.
CSS properties
I’m going to focus on the CSS writing-mode property in this article. It has five possible options:
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
writing-mode: vertical-lr;
writing-mode: sideways-rl;
writing-mode: sideways-lr;
The CSS Writing Modes Specification is designed to support a wide range of written languages in all our human and linguistic complexity. Which—spoiler alert—is pretty insanely complex. The global evolution of written languages has been anything but simple.
So I’ve got to start with explaining some basic concepts of web page layout and writing systems. Then I can show you what these CSS properties do.
Inline Direction, Block Direction, and Character Direction
In the world of the web, there’s a concept of ‘block’ and ‘inline’ layout. If you’ve ever written display: block or display: inline, you’ve leaned on these concepts.
In the default writing mode, blocks stack vertically starting at the top of the page and working their way down. Think of how a bunch of block-levels elements stack—like a bunch of a paragraphs—that’s the block direction.
Inline is how each line of text flows. The default on the web is from left to right, in horizontal lines. Imagine this text that you are reading right now, being typed out one character at a time on a typewriter. That’s the inline direction.
The character direction is which way the characters point. If you type a capital “A” for instance, on which side is the top of the letter? Different languages can point in different directions. Most languages have their characters pointing towards the top of the page, but not all.
Put all three together, and you start to see how they work as a system.
The default settings for the web work like this.
Now that we know what block, inline, and character directions mean, let’s see how they are used in different writing systems from around the world.
The four writing systems of CSS Writing Modes
The CSS Writing Modes Specification handles all the use cases for four major writing systems; Latin, Arabic, Han and Mongolian.
Latin-based systems
One writing system dominates the world more than any other, reportedly covering about 70% of the world’s population.
The text is horizontal, running from left to right, or LTR. The block direction runs from top to bottom.
It’s called the Latin-based system because it includes all languages that use the Latin alphabet, including English, Spanish, German, French, and many others. But there are many non-Latin-alphabet languages that also use this system, including Greek, Cyrillic (Russian, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Serbian, etc.), and Brahmic scripts (Devanagari, Thai, Tibetan), and many more.
You don’t need to do anything in your CSS to trigger this mode. This is the default.
Best practices, however, dictate that you declare in your opening element which language and which direction (LTR or RTL) you are using. This website, for instance, uses to let the browser know this content is published in Great Britian’s version of English, in a left to right direction.
Arabic-based systems
Arabic, Hebrew and a few other languages run the inline direction from right to left. This is commonly known as RTL.
Note that the inline direction still runs horizontally. The block direction runs from top to bottom. And the characters are upright.
It’s not just the flow of text that runs from right to left, but everything about the layout of the website. The upper right-hand corner is the starting position. Important things are on the right. The eyes travel from right to left. So, typically RTL websites use layouts that are just like LTR websites, only flipped.
On websites that support both LTR and RTL, like the United Nations’ site at un.org, the two layouts are mirror images of each other.
For many web developers, our experiences with internationalization have focused solely on supporting Arabic and Hebrew script.
CSS layout hacks for internationalization & RTL
To prepare an LTR project to support RTL, developers have had to create all sorts of hacks. For example, the Drupal community started a convention of marking every margin-left and -right, every padding-left and -right, every float: left and float: right with the comment /* LTR */. Then later developers could search for each instance of that exact comment, and create stylesheets to override each left with right, and vice versa. It’s a tedious and error prone way to work. CSS itself needed a better way to let web developers write their layout code once, and easily switch language directions with a single command.
Our new CSS layout system does exactly that. Flexbox, Grid and Alignment use start and end instead of left and right. This lets us define everything in relationship to the writing system, and switch directions easily. By writing justify-content: flex-start, justify-items: end, and eventually margin-inline-start: 1rem we have code that doesn’t need to be changed.
This is a much better way to work. I know it can be confusing to think through start and end as replacements for left and right. But it’s better for any multiligual project, and it’s better for the web as a whole.
Sadly, I’ve seen CSS preprocessor tools that claim to “fix” the new CSS layout system by getting rid of start and end and bringing back left and right. They want you to use their tool, write justify-content: left, and feel self-righteous. It seems some folks think the new way of working is broken and should be discarded. It was created, however, to fulfill real needs. And to reflect a global internet. As Bruce Lawson says, WWW stands for the World Wide Web, not the Wealthy Western Web. Please don’t try to convince the industry that there’s something wrong with no longer being biased towards western culture. Instead, spread the word about why this new system is here.
Spend a bit of time drilling the concept of inline and block into your head, and getting used to start and end. It will be second nature soon enough.
I’ve also seen CSS preprocessors that let us use this new way of thinking today, even as all the parts aren’t fully supported by browsers yet. Some tools let you write text-align: start instead of text-align: left, and let the preprocessor handle things for you. That is terrific, in my opinion. A great use of the power of a preprocessor to help us switch over now.
But let’s get back to RTL.
How to declare your direction
You don’t want to use CSS to tell the browser to switch from an LTR language to RTL. You want to do this in your HTML. That way the browser has the information it needs to display the document even if the CSS doesn’t load.
This is accomplished mainly on the html element. You should also declare your main language. As I mentioned above, the 24 ways website is using to declare the LTR direction and the use of British English. The UN Arabic website uses to declare the site as an Arabic site, using a RTL layout.
Things get more complicated when you’ve got a page with a mix of languages. But I’m not going to get into all of that, since this article is focused on CSS and layouts, not explaining everything about internationalization.
Let me just leave direction here by noting that much of the heavy work of laying out the characters which make up each word is handled by Unicode. If you are interested in learning more about LTR, RTL and bidirectional text, watch this video: Introduction to Bidirectional Text, a presentation by Elika Etemad.
Meanwhile, let’s get back to CSS.
The writing mode CSS for Latin-based and Arabic-based systems
For both of these systems—Latin-based and Arabic-based, whether LTR or RTL—the same CSS property applies for specifying the writing mode: writing-mode: horizontal-tb. That’s because in both systems, the inline text flow is horizontal, while the block direction is top-to-bottom. This is expressed as horizontal-tb.
horizontal-tb is the default writing mode for the web, so you don’t need to specify it unless you are overriding something else higher up in the cascade. You can just imagine that every site you’ve ever built came with:
html {
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
}
Now let’s turn our attention to the vertical writing systems.
Han-based systems
This is where things start to get interesting.
Han-based writing systems include CJK languages, Chinese, Japanese, Korean and others. There are two options for laying out a page, and sometimes both are used at the same time.
Much of CJK text is laid out like Latin-based languages, with a horizontal top-to-bottom block direction, and a left-to-right inline direction. This is the more modern way to doing things, started in the 20th century in many places, and further pushed into domination by the computer and later the web.
The CSS to do this bit of the layouts is the same as above:
section {
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
}
Or, you know, do nothing, and get that result as a default.
Alternatively Han-based languages can be laid out in a vertical writing mode, where the inline direction runs vertically, and the block direction goes from right to left.
See both options in this diagram:
Note that the horizontal text flows from left to right, while the vertical text flows from right to left. Wild, eh?
This Japanese issue of Vogue magazine is using a mix of writing modes. The cover opens on the left spine, opposite of what an English magazine does.
This page mixes English and Japanese, and typesets the Japanese text in both horizontal and vertical modes. Under the title “Richard Stark” in red, you can see a passage that’s horizontal-tb and LTR, while the longer passage of text at the bottom of the page is typeset vertical-rl. The red enlarged cap marks the beginning of that passage. The long headline above the vertical text is typeset LTR, horizontal-tb.
The details of how to set the default of the whole page will depend on your use case. But each element, each headline, each section, each article can be marked to flow the opposite of the default however you’d like.
For example, perhaps you leave the default as horizontal-tb, and specify your vertical elements like this:
div.articletext {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
}
Or alternatively you could change the default for the page to a vertical orientation, and then set specific elements to horizontal-tb, like this:
html {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
}
h2, .photocaptions, section {
writing-mode: horizontal-tb;
}
If your page has a sideways scroll, then the writing mode will determine whether the page loads with upper left corner as the starting point, and scroll to the right (horizontal-tb as we are used to), or if the page loads with the upper right corner as the starting point, scrolling to the left to display overflow. Here’s an example of that change in scrolling direction, in a CSS Writing Mode demo by Chen Hui Jing. Check out her demo — you can switch from horizontal to vertical writing modes with a checkbox and see the difference.
Mongolian-based systems
Now, hopefully so far all of this kind of makes sense. It might be a bit more complicated than expected, but it’s not so hard. Well, enter the Mongolian-based systems.
Mongolian is also a vertical script language. Text runs vertically down the page. Just like Han-based systems. There are two major differences. First, the block direction runs the other way. In Mongolian, block-level elements stack from left to right.
Here’s a drawing of how Wikipedia would look in Mongolian if it were laid out correctly.
Perhaps the Mongolian version of Wikipedia will be redone with this layout.
Now you might think, that doesn’t look so weird. Tilt your head to the left, and it’s very familiar. The block direction starts on the left side of the screen and goes to the right. The inline direction starts on the top of the page and moves to the bottom (similar to RTL text, just turned 90° counter-clockwise). But here comes the other huge difference. The character direction is “upside down”. The top of the Mongolian characters are not pointing to the left, towards the start edge of the block direction. They point to the right. Like this:
Now you might be tempted to ignore all this. Perhaps you don’t expect to be typesetting Mongolian content anytime soon. But here’s why this is important for everyone — the way Mongolian works defines the results writing-mode: vertical-lr. And it means we cannot use vertical-lr for typesetting content in other languages in the way we might otherwise expect.
If we took what we know about vertical-rl and guessed how vertical-lr works, we might imagine this:
But that’s wrong. Here’s how they actually compare:
See the unexpected situation? In both writing-mode: vertical-rl and writing-mode: vertical-lr latin text is rotated clockwise. Neither writing mode let’s us rotate text counter-clockwise.
If you are typesetting Mongolian content, apply this CSS in the same way you would apply writing-mode to Han-based writing systems. To the whole page on the html element, or to specific pages of the page like this:
section {
writing-mode: vertical-lr;
}
Now, if you are using writing-mode for a graphic design effect on a language that is otherwise typesets horizontally, I don’t think writing-mode: vertical-lr is useful. If the text wraps onto two lines, it stacks in a very unexpected way. So I’ve sort of obliterated it from my toolkit. I find myself using writing-mode: vertical-rl a lot. And never using -lr. Hm.
Writing modes for graphic design
So how do we use writing-mode to turn English headlines sideways? We could rely on transform: rotate()
Here are two examples, one for each direction. (By the way, each of these demos use CSS Grid for their overall layout, so be sure to test them in a browser that supports CSS Grid, like Firefox Nightly.)
In this demo 4A, the text is rotated clockwise using this code:
h1 {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
}
In this demo 4B, the text is rotated counter-clockwise using this code:
h1 {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
transform: rotate(180deg);
text-align: right;
}
I use vertical-rl to rotate the text so that it takes up the proper amount of space in the overall flow of the layout. Then I rotate it 180° to spin it around to the other direction. And then I use text-align: right to get it to rise up to the top of it’s container. This feels like a hack, but it’s a hack that works.
Now what I would like to do instead is use another CSS value that was designed for this use case — one of the two other options for writing mode.
If I could, I would lay out example 4A with:
h1 {
writing-mode: sideways-rl;
}
And layout example 4B with:
h1 {
writing-mode: sideways-lr;
}
The problem is that these two values are only supported in Firefox. None of the other browsers recognize sideways-*. Which means we can’t really use it yet.
In general, the writing-mode property is very well supported across browsers. So I’ll use writing-mode: vertical-rl for now, with the transform: rotate(180deg); hack to fake the other direction.
There’s much more to what we can do with the CSS designed to support multiple languages, but I’m going to stop with this intermediate introduction.
If you do want a bit more of a taste, look at this example that adds text-orientation: upright; to the mix — turning the individual letters of the latin font to be upright instead of sideways.
It’s this demo 4C, with this CSS applied:
h1 {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
text-orientation: upright;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: -25px;
}
You can check out all my Writing Modes demos at labs.jensimmons.com/#writing-modes.
I’ll leave you with this last demo. One that applies a vertical writing mode to the sub headlines of a long article. I like how small details like this can really bring a fresh feeling to the content.
See the Pen Writing Mode Demo — Article Subheadlines by Jen Simmons (@jensimmons) on CodePen.",2016,Jen Simmons,jensimmons,2016-12-23T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2016/css-writing-modes/,code
22,The Responsive Hover Paradigm,"CSS transitions and animations provide web designers with a whole slew of tools to spruce up our designs. Move over ActionScript tweens! The techniques we can now implement with CSS are reminiscent of Flash-based adventures from the pages of web history.
Pairing CSS enhancements with our :hover pseudo-class allows us to add interesting events to our websites. We have a ton of power at our fingertips. However, with this power, we each have to ask ourselves: just because I can do something, should I?
Why bother?
We hear a lot of mantras in the web community. Some proclaim the importance of content; some encourage methods like mobile first to support content; and others warn of the overhead and speed impact of decorative flourishes and visual images. I agree, one hundred percent. At the same time, I believe that content can reign king and still provide a beautiful design with compelling interactions and acceptable performance impacts. Maybe, just maybe, we can even have a little bit of fun when crafting these systems!
Yes, a site with pure HTML content and no CSS will load very fast on your mobile phone, but it leaves a lot to be desired. If you went to your local library and every book looked the same, how would you know which one to borrow? Imagine if every book was printed on the same paper stock with the same cover page in the same type size set at a legible point value… how would you know if you were going to purchase a cookbook about wild game or a young adult story about teens fighting to the death?
For certain audiences, seeing a site with hip, lively hovers sure beats a stale website concept. I’ve worked on many higher education sites, and setting the interactive options is often a very important factor in engaging potential students, alumni, and donors. The same can go for e-commerce sites: enticing your audience with surprise and delight factors can be the difference between a successful and a lost sale.
Knowing your content and audience can help you decide if an intriguing experience is appropriate for your site; if it is, then hover responses can be a real asset.
Why hover?
We have all these capabilities with CSS properties to create the aforementioned fun interactions, and it would be quite easy to fall back into some old patterns and animation abuse. The world of Flash intros and skip links could be recreated with CSS keyframes. However, I don’t think any of us want to go the route of forcing users into unwanted exchanges and road blocking content.
What’s great about utilizing hover to pair with CSS powered actions is that it’s user initiated. It’s a well-established expectation that when a user mouses over an object, something changes. If we can identify that something as a link, then we will expect something to change as we move our mouse over it. By waiting to trigger a CSS-based response until a user chooses to engage with a target makes for a more polished experience (as opposed to barraging our screens with animations all willy-nilly). This makes it the perfect opportunity to add some unique spunk.
What about mobile, touch, and responsive?
So, you’re on board with this so far, but what about mobile and touch devices? Sure, some devices like the Samsung Galaxy S4 have some hovering capabilities, but certainly most do not. Beyond mobile devices, we also have to worry about desktops with touch capabilities. It’s super difficult to detect if a user is currently using touch or hover. One option we have is to design strictly for touch only and send hover enhancements to the graveyard. However, being that I’m all “fuck yeah hovers!,” I like to explore all options. So, let’s examine four different types of hover patterns and see how they can translate to our touch devices.
1. The essential text hover
Changing text color on hover is something we’ve done for a while and it has helped aid in identifying links. To maintain the best accessibility we can achieve, it helps to have a different visual indicator on the default :link state, such as an underline. By making sure all text links have an underline, we won’t have to rely on visual changes during hover to make sure touch device users know that it is a link. For hover-enabled devices, we can add a basic color transition. Doing so creates a nice fade, which makes the change on hover less jarring. Kinda like smooth jazz. The code* to achieve this is quite simple:
a {
color: #6dd4b1;
transition: color 0.25s linear;
}
a:hover, a:focus {
color: #357099;
}
Browser prefixes are omitted
You can see in the final result that, for both touch and hover, everyone wins:
See the Pen Most Basic Link Transition by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
2. Visual background wizardry and animated hovers
We can take this a step further by again making changes to our aesthetic on hover, but not making any content changes. Altering image hovers for fun and personality can separate your site from others; that personality is important and can enhance our content.
Let’s look at a few sites that do this really well. Scroll down to the judges section of CSS Off and check out the illustrations of the judges. On hover, the illustration fades into a photo of the judge. This provides a realistic alternative to the drawing. Users without the hover can click into the detail page, where they can see the full color picture and learn more about the judges; the information is still available through a different pathway.
Going back to the higher education field, let’s visit Delaware Valley College. The school had recently gone through a rebranding that included loop icons as a symbol to connect ideas. These icons are brought into the website on hover of the slideshow arrows (WebKit browsers). The hover reveals a loop animation, tying in overall themes and adding some extra pizzazz that makes me think, “This is a hip place that feels current.” For visitors who can’t access the hover effect, the default arrow state clearly represents a clickable link, and there is swipe functionality on mobile devices to boot.
DIY.org’s Frontend Dev page has a bunch of enjoyable hover actions happening, featuring scaling transforms and looping animations. Nothing new is revealed on hover, so touch devices won’t miss anything, but it intrigues the user who is visiting a site about front-end dev doing cool front-end things. It backs up its claim of front-end knowledge by adding this enhancement.
The old Cowork Chicago (now redirecting) had a great example, captured here:
Coop: Chicago Coworking from Jenn Lukas on Vimeo.
The code for the Join areas is quite simple:
.join-buttons .daily, .join-buttons .monthly {
height: 260px; z-index: 0; margin-top: 30px;
transition: height .2s linear,margin .2s linear;
}
.join-buttons .daily:hover, .join-buttons .monthly:hover {
height: 280px; margin-top: 20px;
}
li.button:hover {
z-index: 20;
}
The slight rotation on the photos, and the change of color and size of the rate options on hover, add to the fun factor. The site attempts to advertise the co-working space by letting bits of their charisma show through with these transitions. They don’t hit the user over the head with animations, but provide a nice addition to make sure visitors know it’s a welcoming place to work. Some text is added on the hover, but the text isn’t essential to determine where the link goes.
3. Image block hovers
There have been more designs popping up with large image blocks acting as extensive hit area links to subsequent pages. On hover of these links, text is revealed, letting the user know where the link destination goes.
See the Pen Transitioning Max Height by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
This type of link is tough for users on touch as the image might not provide enough context to reveal its target. If you weren’t aware of what my illustrated avatar from 2007 looked like (or even if you did), then how would you know that this is a link to my Twitter page? Instead, if we provide enough context — such as the @jennlukas handle — you could assume the destination. Users who receive the hover can also see the Twitter bio. It won’t break the experience for users that can’t hover, but it will provide a nice interaction and some more information for those that can.
See the Pen Transitioning Max Height by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
The Esquire site follows this same pattern, in which the title of the story is shown and the subheading is revealed on hover. Dining at Altitude took the opposite approach, where all text is shown by default and, on hover, you can see more of the image that the text sits atop. This is a nice technique to follow. For touch users, following the link will allow them to see more of the image detail that was revealed on hover.
4. Drop-down navigation menu hovers
Main navigation options that rely on hover have come up as a problem for touch. One way to address this is to be sure your top level items are all functional links to somewhere, and not blank anchors to trigger a submenu drop-down. This ensures that, even without the hover-triggered menu, users can still navigate to those top-level pages. From there, they should be able to access the tertiary pages shown in the drop-down. Following this arrangement, drop-down menus act as a quick shortcut and aren’t necessary to the navigational structure. If the top navigation items are your most visited pages, this execution won’t hinder your visitors.
If the information within the menu is vital, such as a lone account menu, another option is to show drop-down menus on click instead of hover. This pattern will allow both mouse and touch users to access the drop-downs.
Why can’t we just detect hover?
This is a really tricky thing to do. Internet Explorer 10 on Windows 8 uses the aria-haspopup attribute to simulate hover on touch devices, but usually our audience stretches beyond that group. There’s been discussion around using Modernizr, but false positives have come with that. A W3C draft for Media Queries Level 4 includes a hover feature, but it’s not supported yet. Since some devices can hover and touch, should you rely on hover effects for those? Arguments have come up that users can be browsing your site with a mouse and then decide to switch to touch, or vice versa. That might be a large concern for you, or it might be an edge case that isn’t vital to your site’s success.
For one site, I used mousemove and touchstart JavaScript events in order to detect if a visitor starts to browse the site with a mouse. The design initiates for touch users, showing all text on load, but as soon as a mouse movement occurs, the text becomes hidden and is then revealed on hover.
See the Pen Detect Touch devices with mousemove and touchstart by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
One downside to this approach is that the text is viewable until a mouse enters the document, but if the elements are further down the page it might not be noticed. A second downside is if a user on a touch- and hover-enabled device starts browsing with the mouse and then switches back to touch, the hover-centric styles will remain until a new page load. These were acceptable scenarios in the project I worked on, but might not be for every project.
Can we give our visitors a choice?
I’ve been thinking about how we can combat the concern of not knowing if our customers are using touch or a mouse, not to mention keyboard or Wacom tablets or Minority Report screens. We can cover keyboards with our friend :focus, but that still doesn’t solve our other dilemmas.
Remember when we couldn’t rely on browsers to zoom text and we had to use those small A, medium A, big A [AAA] buttons? On selection of one of those options, a different style sheet would load with small, medium, or large text sizes to satisfy our user’s request. We could even set cookies to remember their font choices. What if we offered a similar solution, a hover/touch switcher, for our new predicament?
See the Pen cwuJf by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
We could add this switcher to our design. Maybe add it to the header on smaller screens and the footer on larger screens to play the odds. Then be sure to deliver the appropriate touch- or hover-optimized adventure for our guests.
How about adding View options in the areas where we’re hiding content until hover? Looking at Delta Cycle, there’s logic in place to switch layouts on some mobile devices. On desktops we can see the layout shows the product and price by default, and the name of the item and an Add to cart button on hover. If you want to keep this hover, but also worry that touch users can’t access it — or even if you are concerned that people might want to view it with more details up front — we could add another view switcher.
See the Pen List/Grid Views for Hover or Touch by Jenn Lukas (@Jenn) on CodePen
Similar to the list versus grid view we often see in operating systems, a choice here could cover all of our bases.
Conclusion
There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to hover patterns. Design for your content. If you are providing important information about driving directions or healthcare, you might want to err on the side of designing for touch only. If you are behind an educational site and trying to entice more traffic and sign-ups, or a more immersive e-commerce site selling pies, then hover activity can help support your content and engage your visitors without being a detriment. While content can be our top priority, let’s not forget that our designs and interactions, hovers included, can have a great positive impact on how visitors experience our site. Hover wisely, friends.",2013,Jenn Lukas,jennlukas,2013-12-12T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2013/the-responsive-hover-paradigm/,
242,Creating My First Chrome Extension,"Writing a Chrome Extension isn’t as scary at it seems!
Not too long ago, I used a Chrome extension called 20 Cubed. I’m far-sighted, and being a software engineer makes it difficult to maintain distance vision. So I used 20 Cubed to remind myself to look away from my screen and rest my eyes. I loved its simple interface and design. I loved it so much, I often forgot to turn it off in the middle of presentations, where it would take over my entire screen. Oops.
Unfortunately, the developer stopped updating the extension and removed it from Chrome’s extension library. I was so sad. None of the other eye rest extensions out there matched my design aesthetic, so I decided to create my own! Want to do the same?
Fortunately, Google has some respectable documentation on how to create an extension. And remember, Chrome extensions are just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. You can add libraries and frameworks, or you can just code the “old-fashioned” way. Sky’s the limit!
Setup
But first, some things you’ll need to know about before getting started:
Callbacks
Timeouts
Chrome Dev Tools
Developing with Chrome extension methods requires a lot of callbacks. If you’ve never experienced the joy of callback hell, creating a Chrome extension will introduce you to this concept. However, things can get confusing pretty quickly. I’d highly recommend brushing up on that subject before getting started.
Hyperbole and a Half
Timeouts and Intervals are another thing you might want to brush up on. While creating this extension, I didn’t consider the fact that I’d be juggling three timers. And I probably would’ve saved time organizing those and reading up on the Chrome extension Alarms documentation beforehand. But more on that in a bit.
On the note of organization, abstraction is important! You might have any combination of the following:
The Chrome extension options page
The popup from the Chrome Menu
The windows or tabs you create
The background scripts
And that can get unwieldy. You might also edit the existing tabs or windows in the browser, which you’ll probably want as a separate script too. Note that this tutorial only covers creating your own customized window rather than editing existing windows or tabs.
Alright, now that you know all that up front, let’s get going!
Documentation
TL;DR READ THE DOCS.
A few things to get started:
Read Google’s primer on browser extensions
Have a look at their Getting started tutorial
Check out their overview on Chrome Extensions
This overview discusses the Chrome extension files, architecture, APIs, and communication between pages. Funnily enough, I only discovered the Overview page after creating my extension.
The manifest.json file gives the browser information about the extension, including general information, where to find your extension files and icons, and API permissions required. Here’s what my manifest.json looked like, for example:
https://github.com/jennz0r/eye-rest/blob/master/manifest.json
Because I’m a visual learner, I found the images that describe the extension’s architecture most helpful.
To clarify this diagram, the background.js file is the extension’s event handler. It’s constantly listening for browser events, which you’ll feed to it using the Chrome Extension API. Google says that an effective background script is only loaded when it is needed and unloaded when it goes idle.
The Popup is the little window that appears when you click on an extension’s icon in the Chrome Menu. It consists of markup and scripts, and you can tell the browser where to find it in the manifest.json under page_action: { ""default_popup"": FILE_NAME_HERE }.
The Options page is exactly as it says. This displays customizable options only visible to the user when they either right-click on the Chrome menu and choose “Options” under an extension. This also consists of markup and scripts, and you can tell the browser where to find it in the manifest.json under options_page: FILE_NAME_HERE.
Content scripts are any scripts that will interact with any web windows or tabs that the user has open. These scripts will also interact with any tabs or windows opened by your extension.
Debugging
A quick note: don’t forget the debugging tutorial!
Just like any other Chrome window, every piece of an extension has an inspector and dev tools. If (read: when) you run into errors (as I did), you’re likely to have several inspector windows open – one for the background script, one for the popup, one for the options, and one for the window or tab the extension is interacting with.
For example, I kept seeing the error “This request exceeds the MAX_WRITE_OPERATIONS_PER_HOUR quota.” Well, it turns out there are limitations on how often you can sync stored information.
Another error I kept seeing was “Alarm delay is less than minimum of 1 minutes. In released .crx, alarm “ALARM_NAME_HERE” will fire in approximately 1 minutes”. Well, it turns out there are minimum interval times for alarms.
Chrome Extension creation definitely benefits from debugging skills. Especially with callbacks and listeners, good old fashioned console.log can really help!
Me adding a ton of `console.log`s while trying to debug my alarms.
Eye Rest Functionality
Ok, so what is the extension I created? Again, it’s a way to rest your eyes every twenty minutes for twenty seconds. So, the basic functionality should look like the following:
If the extension is running AND
If the user has not clicked Pause in the Popup HTML AND
If the counter in the Popup HTML is down to 00:00 THEN
Open a new window with Timer HTML AND
Start a 20 sec countdown in Timer HTML AND
Reset the Popup HTML counter to 20:00
If the Timer HTML is down to 0 sec THEN
Close that window. Rinse. Repeat.
Sounds simple enough, but wow, these timers became convoluted! Of all the Chrome extensions I decided to create, I decided to make one that’s heavily dependent on time, intervals, and having those in sync with each other. In other words, I made this unnecessarily complicated and didn’t realize until I started coding.
For visual reference of my confusion, check out the GitHub repository for Eye Rest. (And yes, it’s a pun.)
API
Now let’s discuss the APIs that I used to build this extension.
Alarms
What even are alarms? I didn’t know either.
Alarms are basically Chrome’s setTimeout and setInterval. They exist because, as Google says…
DOM-based timers, such as window.setTimeout() or window.setInterval(), are not honored in non-persistent background scripts if they trigger when the event page is dormant.
For more information, check out this background migration doc.
One interesting note about alarms in Chrome extensions is that they are persistent. Garbage collection with Chrome extension alarms seems unreliable at best. I didn’t have much luck using the clearAll method to remove alarms I created on previous extension loads or installs. A workaround (read: hack) is to specify a unique alarm name every time your extension is loaded and clearing any other alarms without that unique name.
Background Scripts
For Eye Rest, I have two background scripts. One is my actual initializer and event listener, and the other is a helpers file.
I wanted to share a couple of functions between my Background and Popup scripts. Specifically, the clearAndCreateAlarm function. I wanted my background script to clear any existing alarms, create a new alarm, and add remaining time until the next alarm to local storage immediately upon extension load. To make the function available to the Background script, I added helpers.js as the first item under background > scripts in my manifest.json.
I also wanted my Popup script to do the same things when the user has unpaused the extension’s functionality. To make the function available to the Popup script, I just include the helpers script in the Popup HTML file.
Other APIs
Windows
I use the Windows API to create the Timer window when the time of my alarm is up. The window creation is initiated by my Background script.
One day, while coding late into the evening, I found it very confusing that the window.create method included url as an option. I assumed it was meant to be an external web address. A friend pondered that there must be an option to specify the window’s HTML. Until then, it hadn’t dawned on me that the url could be relative. Duh. I was tired!
I pass the timer.html as the url option, as well as type, size, position, and other visual options.
Storage
Maybe you want to pass information back and forth between the Background script and your Popup script? You can do that using Chrome or local storage. One benefit of using local storage over Chrome’s storage is avoiding quotas and write operation maximums.
I wanted to pass the time at which the latest alarm was set, the time to the next alarm, and whether or not the timer is paused between the Background and Popup scripts. Because the countdown should change every second, it’s quite complicated and requires lots of writes. That’s why I went with the user’s local storage. You can see me getting and setting those variables in my Background, Helper, and Popup scripts. Just search for date, nextAlarmTime, and isPaused.
Declarative Content
The Declarative Content API allows you to show your extension’s page action based on several type of matches, without needing to take a host permission or inject a content script. So you’ll need this to get your extension to work in the browser!
You can see me set this in my Background script. Because I want my extension’s popup to appear on every page one is browsing, I leave the page matchers empty.
There are many more APIs for Chrome apps and extensions, so make sure to surf around and see what features are available!
The Extension
Here’s what my original Popup looked like before I added styles.
And here’s what it looks like with new styles. I guess I’m going for a Nickelodeon feel.
And here’s the Timer window and Popup together!
Publishing
Publishing is a cinch. You just zip up your files, create a new or use an existing Google Developer account, upload the files, add some details, and pay a one time $5 fee. That’s all! Then your extension will be available on the Chrome extension store! Neato :D
My extension is now available for you to install.
Conclusion
I thought creating a time based Chrome Extension would be quick and easy. I was wrong. It was more complicated than I thought! But it’s definitely achievable with some time, persistence, and good ole Google searches.
Eventually, I’d like to add more interactive elements to Eye Rest. For example, hitting the YouTube API to grab a silly or cute video as a reward for looking away during the 20 sec countdown and not closing the timer window. This harkens back to one of my first web projects, Toothtimer, from 2012. Or maybe a way to change the background colors of the Timer and Popup!
Either way, with Eye Rest’s framework built out, I’m feeling fearless about future feature adds! Building this Chrome extension took some broken nails, achy shoulders, and tired eyes, but now Eye Rest can tell me to give my eyes a break every 20 minutes.",2018,Jennifer Wong,jenniferwong,2018-12-05T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2018/my-first-chrome-extension/,code
46,Responsive Enhancement,"24 ways has been going strong for ten years. That’s an aeon in internet timescales. Just think of all the changes we’ve seen in that time: the rise of Ajax, the explosion of mobile devices, the unrecognisably changed landscape of front-end tooling.
Tools and technologies come and go, but one thing has remained constant for me over the past decade: progressive enhancement.
Progressive enhancement isn’t a technology. It’s more like a way of thinking. Instead of thinking about the specifics of how a finished website might look, progressive enhancement encourages you to think about the fundamental meaning of what the website is providing. So instead of thinking of a website in terms of its ideal state in a modern browser on a nice widescreen device, progressive enhancement allows you to think about the core functionality in a more abstract way.
Once you’ve figured out what the core functionality is – adding an item to a shopping cart, posting a message, sharing a photo – then you can enable that functionality in the simplest possible way. That usually means starting with good old-fashioned HTML. Links and forms are often all you need. Then, once you have the core functionality working in a basic way, you can start to enhance to make a progressively better experience for more modern browsers.
The advantage of working this way isn’t just that your site will work in older browsers (albeit in a rudimentary way). It also ensures that if anything goes wrong in a modern browser, it won’t be catastrophic.
There’s a common misconception that progressive enhancement means that you’ll spend your time dealing with older browsers, but in fact the opposite is true. Putting the basic functionality into place doesn’t take very long at all. And once you’ve done that, you’re free to spend all your time experimenting with the latest and greatest browser technologies, secure in the knowledge that even if they aren’t universally supported yet, that’s OK: you’ve already got your fallback in place.
The key to thinking about web development this way is realising that there isn’t one final interface – there could be many, slightly different interfaces depending on the properties and capabilities of any particular user agent at any particular moment. And that’s OK. Websites do not need to look the same in every browser.
Once you truly accept that, it’s an immensely liberating idea. Instead of spending your time trying to make websites look the same in wildly varying browsers, you can spend your time making sure that the core functionality of what you build works everywhere, while providing the best possible experience for more capable browsers.
Allow me to demonstrate with a simple example: navigation.
Step one: core functionality
Let’s say we have a straightforward website about the twelve days of Christmas, with a page for each day. The core functionality is pretty clear:
To read about any particular day.
To browse from day to day.
The first is easily satisfied by marking up the text with headings, paragraphs and all the usual structural HTML elements. The second is satisfied by providing a list of good ol’ hyperlinks.
Now where’s the best place to position this navigation list? Personally, I’m a big fan of the jump-to-footer pattern. This puts the content first and the navigation second. At the top of the page there’s a link with an href attribute pointing to the fragment identifier for the navigation.
Menu
...
...
Dismiss
See the footer-anchor pattern in action.
Because it’s nothing more than a hyperlink, this works in just about every browser since the dawn of the web. Following hyperlinks is what web browsers were made to do (hence the name).
Step two: layout as an enhancement
The footer-anchor pattern is a particularly neat solution on small-screen devices, like mobile phones. Once more screen real estate is available, I can use the magic of CSS to reposition the navigation above the content. I could use position: absolute, flexbox or, in this case, display: table.
@media all and (min-width: 35em) {
.control {
display: none;
}
body {
display: table;
}
[role=""navigation""] {
display: table-caption;
columns: 6 15em;
}
}
See the styles for wider screens in action
Step three: enhance!
Right. At this point I’m providing core functionality to everyone, and I’ve got nice responsive styles for wider screens. I could stop here, but the real advantage of progressive enhancement is that I don’t have to. From here on, I can go crazy adding all sorts of fancy enhancements for modern browsers, without having to worry about providing a fallback for older browsers – the fallback is already in place.
What I’d really like is to provide a swish off-canvas pattern for small-screen devices. Here’s my plan:
Position the navigation under the main content.
Listen out for the .control links being activated and intercept that action.
When those links are activated, toggle a class of .active on the body.
If the .active class exists, slide the content out to reveal the navigation.
Here’s the CSS for positioning the content and navigation:
@media all and (max-width: 35em) {
[role=""main""] {
transition: all .25s;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
[role=""navigation""] {
width: 75%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
.active [role=""main""] {
transform: translateX(-75%);
}
}
In my JavaScript, I’m going to listen out for any clicks on the .control links and toggle the .active class on the body accordingly:
(function (win, doc) {
'use strict';
var linkclass = 'control',
activeclass = 'active',
toggleClassName = function (element, toggleClass) {
var reg = new RegExp('(s|^)' + toggleClass + '(s|$)');
if (!element.className.match(reg)) {
element.className += ' ' + toggleClass;
} else {
element.className = element.className.replace(reg, '');
}
},
navListener = function (ev) {
ev = ev || win.event;
var target = ev.target || ev.srcElement;
if (target.className.indexOf(linkclass) !== -1) {
ev.preventDefault();
toggleClassName(doc.body, activeclass);
}
};
doc.addEventListener('click', navListener, false);
}(this, this.document));
I’m all set, right? Not so fast!
Cutting the mustard
I’ve made the assumption that addEventListener will be available in my JavaScript. That isn’t a safe assumption. That’s because JavaScript – unlike HTML or CSS – isn’t fault-tolerant. If you use an HTML element or attribute that a browser doesn’t understand, or if you use a CSS selector, property or value that a browser doesn’t understand, it’s no big deal. The browser will just ignore what it doesn’t understand: it won’t throw an error, and it won’t stop parsing the file.
JavaScript is different. If you make an error in your JavaScript, or use a JavaScript method or property that a browser doesn’t recognise, that browser will throw an error, and it will stop parsing the file. That’s why it’s important to test for features before using them in JavaScript. That’s also why it isn’t safe to rely on JavaScript for core functionality.
In my case, I need to test for the existence of addEventListener:
(function (win, doc) {
if (!win.addEventListener) {
return;
}
...
}(this, this.document));
The good folk over at the BBC call this kind of feature test cutting the mustard. If a browser passes the test, it cuts the mustard, and so it gets the enhancements. If a browser doesn’t cut the mustard, it doesn’t get the enhancements. And that’s fine because, remember, websites don’t need to look the same in every browser.
I want to make sure that my off-canvas styles are only going to apply to mustard-cutting browsers. I’m going to use JavaScript to add a class of .cutsthemustard to the document:
(function (win, doc) {
if (!win.addEventListener) {
return;
}
...
var enhanceclass = 'cutsthemustard';
doc.documentElement.className += ' ' + enhanceclass;
}(this, this.document));
Now I can use the existence of that class name to adjust my CSS:
@media all and (max-width: 35em) {
.cutsthemustard [role=""main""] {
transition: all .25s;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
.cutsthemustard [role=""navigation""] {
width: 75%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
.cutsthemustard .active [role=""main""] {
transform: translateX(-75%);
}
}
See the enhanced mustard-cutting off-canvas navigation. Remember, this only applies to small screens so you might have to squish your browser window.
Enhance all the things!
This was a relatively simple example, but it illustrates the thinking behind progressive enhancement: once you’re providing the core functionality to everyone, you’re free to go crazy with all the latest enhancements for modern browsers.
Progressive enhancement doesn’t mean you have to provide all the same functionality to everyone – quite the opposite. That’s why it’s key to figure out early on what the core functionality is, and make sure that it can be provided with the most basic technology. But from that point on, you’re free to add many more features that aren’t mission-critical. You should reward more capable browsers by giving them more of those features, such as animation in CSS, geolocation in JavaScript, and new input types in HTML.
Like I said, progressive enhancement isn’t a technology. It’s a way of thinking. Once you start thinking this way, you’ll be prepared for whatever the next ten years throws at us.",2014,Jeremy Keith,jeremykeith,2014-12-09T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2014/responsive-enhancement/,code
116,The IE6 Equation,"It is the destiny of one browser to serve as the nemesis of web developers everywhere. At the birth of the Web Standards movement, that role was played by Netscape Navigator 4; an outdated browser that refused to die. Its tenacious existence hampered the adoption of modern standards. Today that role is played by Internet Explorer 6.
There’s a sensation that I’m sure you’re familiar with. It’s a horrible mixture of dread and nervousness. It’s the feeling you get when—after working on a design for a while in a standards-compliant browser like Firefox, Safari or Opera—you decide that you can no longer put off the inevitable moment when you must check the site in IE6. Fingers are crossed, prayers are muttered, but alas, to no avail. The nemesis browser invariably screws something up.
What do you do next? If the differences in IE6 are minor, you could just leave it be. After all, websites don’t need to look exactly the same in all browsers. But if there are major layout issues and a significant portion of your audience is still using IE6, you’ll probably need to roll up your sleeves and start fixing the problems.
A common approach is to quarantine IE6-specific CSS in a separate stylesheet. This stylesheet can then be referenced from the HTML document using conditional comments like this:
That stylesheet will only be served up to Internet Explorer where the version number is less than 7.
You can put anything inside a conditional comment. You could put a script element in there. So as well as serving up browser-specific CSS, it’s possible to serve up browser-specific JavaScript.
A few years back, before Microsoft released Internet Explorer 7, JavaScript genius Dean Edwards wrote a script called IE7. This amazing piece of code uses JavaScript to make Internet Explorer 5 and 6 behave like a standards-compliant browser. Dean used JavaScript to bootstrap IE’s CSS support.
Because the script is specifically targeted at Internet Explorer, there’s no point in serving it up to other browsers. Conditional comments to the rescue:
Standards-compliant browsers won’t fetch the script. Users of IE6, on the hand, will pay a kind of bad browser tax by having to download the JavaScript file.
So when should you develop an IE6-specific stylesheet and when should you just use Dean’s JavaScript code? This is the question that myself and my co-worker Natalie Downe set out to answer one morning at Clearleft. We realised that in order to answer that question you need to first answer two other questions, how much time does it take to develop for IE6? and how much of your audience is using IE6?
Let’s say that t represents the total development time. Let t6 represent the portion of that time you spend developing for IE6. If your total audience is a, then a6 is the portion of your audience using IE6. With some algebraic help from our mathematically minded co-worker Cennydd Bowles, Natalie and I came up with the following equation to calculate the percentage likelihood that you should be using Dean’s IE7 script:
p = 50 [ log ( at6 / ta6 ) + 1 ]
Try plugging in your own numbers. If you spend a lot of time developing for IE6 and only a small portion of your audience is using that browser, you’ll get a very high number out of the equation; you should probably use the IE7 script. But if you only spend a little time developing for IE6 and a significant portion of you audience are still using that browser, you’ll get a very small value for p; you might as well write an IE6-specific stylesheet.
Of course this equation is somewhat disingenuous. While it’s entirely possible to research the percentage of your audience still using IE6, it’s not so easy to figure out how much of your development time will be spent developing for that one browser. You can’t really know until you’ve already done the development, by which time the equation is irrelevant.
Instead of using the equation, you could try imposing a limit on how long you will spend developing for IE6. Get your site working in standards-compliant browsers first, then give yourself a time limit to get it working in IE6. If you can’t solve all the issues in that time limit, switch over to using Dean’s script. You could even make the time limit directly proportional to the percentage of your audience using IE6. If 20% of your audience is still using IE6 and you’ve just spent five days getting the site working in standards-compliant browsers, give yourself one day to get it working in IE6. But if 50% of your audience is still using IE6, be prepared to spend 2.5 days wrestling with your nemesis.
All of these different methods for dealing with IE6 demonstrate that there’s no one single answer that works for everyone. They also highlight a problem with the current debate around dealing with IE6. There’s no shortage of blog posts, articles and even entire websites discussing when to drop support for IE6. But very few of them take the time to define what they mean by “support.” This isn’t a binary issue. There is no Boolean answer. Instead, there’s a sliding scale of support:
Block IE6 users from your site.
Develop with web standards and don’t spend any development time testing in IE6.
Use the Dean Edwards IE7 script to bootstrap CSS support in IE6.
Write an IE6 stylesheet to address layout issues.
Make your site look exactly the same in IE6 as in any other browser.
Each end of that scale is extreme. I don’t think that anybody should be actively blocking any browser but neither do I think that users of an outdated browser should get exactly the same experience as users of a more modern browser. The real meanings of “supporting” or “not supporting” IE6 lie somewhere in-between those extremes.
Just as I think that semantics are important in markup, they are equally important in our discussion of web development. So let’s try to come up with some better terms than using the catch-all verb “support.” If you say in your client contract that you “support” IE6, define exactly what that means. If you find yourself in a discussion about “dropping support” for IE6, take the time to explain what you think that entails.
The web developers at Yahoo! are on the right track with their concept of graded browser support. I’m interested in hearing more ideas of how to frame this discussion. If we can all agree to use clear and precise language, we stand a better chance of defeating our nemesis.",2008,Jeremy Keith,jeremykeith,2008-12-08T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2008/the-ie6-equation/,code
128,Boost Your Hyperlink Power,"There are HTML elements and attributes that we use every day. Headings, paragraphs, lists and images are the mainstay of every Web developer’s toolbox. Perhaps the most common tool of all is the anchor. The humble a element is what joins documents together to create the gloriously chaotic collection we call the World Wide Web.
Anatomy of an Anchor
The power of the anchor element lies in the href attribute, short for hypertext reference. This creates a one-way link to another resource, usually another page on the Web:
The href attribute sits in the opening a tag and some descriptive text sits between the opening and closing tags:
Drew McLellan
“Whoop-dee-freakin’-doo,” I hear you say, “this is pretty basic stuff” – and you’re quite right. But there’s more to the anchor element than just the href attribute.
The Theory of relativity
You might be familiar with the rel attribute from the link element. I bet you’ve got something like this in the head of your documents:
my RSS feed .
You can add extra information to this anchor using the rel attribute:
Subscribe to my RSS feed .
There’s no prescribed list of values for the rel attribute so you can use whatever you decide is semantically meaningful. Let’s say you’ve got a complex e-commerce application that includes a link to a help file. You can explicitly declare the relationship of the linked file as being “help”:
need help?
Elemental Microformats
Although it’s completely up to you what values you use for the rel attribute, some consensus is emerging in the form of microformats. Some of the simplest microformats make good use of rel. For example, if you are linking to a license that covers the current document, use the rel-license microformat:
Licensed under a Creative Commons attribution license
That describes the relationship of the linked document as “license.”
The rel-tag microformat goes a little further. It uses rel to describe the final part of the URL of the linked file as a “tag” for the current document:
Learn more about semantic markup
This states that the current document is being tagged with the value “Microformats.”
XFN, which stands for XHTML Friends Network, is a way of describing relationships between people:
Drew McLellan
This microformat makes use of a very powerful property of the rel attribute. Like the class attribute, rel can take multiple values, separated by spaces:
Drew McLellan
Here I’m describing Drew as being a friend, someone I’ve met, and a colleague (because we’re both Web monkies).
You Say You Want a revolution
While rel describes the relationship of the linked resource to the current document, the rev attribute describes the reverse relationship: it describes the relationship of the current document to the linked resource. Here’s an example of a link that might appear on help.html:
continue shopping
The rev attribute declares that the current document is “help” for the linked file.
The vote-links microformat makes use of the rev attribute to allow you to qualify your links. By using the value “vote-for” you can describe your document as being an endorsement of the linked resource:
I agree with Richard Dawkins .
There’s a corresponding vote-against value. This means that you can link to a document but explicitly state that you don’t agree with it.
I agree with Richard Dawkins
about those creationists .
Of course there’s nothing to stop you using both rel and rev on the same hyperlink:
Richard Dawkins
The Wisdom of Crowds
The simplicity of rel and rev belies their power. They allow you to easily add extra semantic richness to your hyperlinks. This creates a bounty that can be harvested by search engines, aggregators and browsers. Make it your New Year’s resolution to make friends with these attributes and extend the power of hypertext.",2006,Jeremy Keith,jeremykeith,2006-12-18T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2006/boost-your-hyperlink-power/,code
169,Incite A Riot,"Given its relatively limited scope, HTML can be remarkably expressive. With a bit of lateral thinking, we can mark up content such as tag clouds and progress meters, even when we don’t have explicit HTML elements for those patterns.
Suppose we want to mark up a short conversation:
Alice: I think Eve is watching.
Bob: This isn’t a cryptography tutorial …we’re in the wrong example!
A note in the the HTML 4.01 spec says it’s okay to use a definition list:
Another application of DL, for example, is for marking up dialogues, with each DT naming a speaker, and each DD containing his or her words.
That would give us:
Alice : I think Eve is watching.
Bob : This isn't a cryptography tutorial ...we're in the wrong example!
This usage of a definition list is proof that writing W3C specifications and smoking crack are not mutually exclusive activities. “I think Eve is watching” is not a definition of “Alice.” If you (ab)use a definition list in this way, Norm will hunt you down.
The conversation problem was revisited in HTML5. What if dt and dd didn’t always mean “definition title” and “definition description”? A new element was forged: dialog. Now the the “d” in dt and dd doesn’t stand for “definition”, it stands for “dialog” (or “dialogue” if you can spell):
Alice : I think Eve is watching.
Bob : This isn't a cryptography tutorial ...we're in the wrong example!
Problem solved …except that dialog is no longer in the HTML5 spec. Hixie further expanded the meaning of dt and dd so that they could be used inside details (which makes sense—it starts with a “d”) and figure (…um). At the same time as the content model of details and figure were being updated, the completely-unrelated dialog element was dropped.
Back to the drawing board, or in this case, the HTML 4.01 specification. The spec defines the cite element thusly:
Contains a citation or a reference to other sources.
Perfect! There’s even an example showing how this can applied when attributing quotes to people:
As Harry S. Truman said,
The buck stops here.
For longer quotes, the blockquote element might be more appropriate. In a conversation, where the order matters, I think an ordered list would make a good containing element for this pattern:
Alice : I think Eve is watching. Bob : This isn't a cryptography tutorial ...we're in the wrong example!
Problem solved …except that the cite element has been redefined in the HTML5 spec:
The cite element represents the title of a work … A person’s name is not the title of a work … and the element must therefore not be used to mark up people’s names.
HTML5 is supposed to be backwards compatible with previous versions of HTML, yet here we have a semantic pattern already defined in HTML 4.01 that is now non-conforming in HTML5. The entire justification for the change boils down to this line of reasoning:
Given that: titles of works are often italicised and
given that: people’s names are not often italicised and
given that: most browsers italicise the contents of the cite element,
therefore: the cite element should not be used to mark up people’s names.
In other words, the default browser styling is now dictating semantic meaning. The tail is wagging the dog.
Not to worry, the HTML5 spec tells us how we can mark up names in conversations without using the cite element:
In some cases, the b element might be appropriate for names
I believe the colloquial response to this is a combination of the letters W, T and F, followed by a question mark.
The non-normative note continues:
In other cases, if an element is really needed, the span element can be used.
This is not a joke. We are seriously being told to use semantically meaningless elements to mark up content that is semantically meaningful.
We don’t have to take it.
Firstly, any conformance checker—that’s the new politically correct term for “validator”—cannot possibly check every instance of the cite element to see if it’s really the title of a work and not the name of a person. So we can disobey the specification without fear of invalidating our documents.
Secondly, Hixie has repeatedly stated that browser makers have a powerful voice in deciding what goes into the HTML5 spec; if a browser maker refuses to implement a feature, then that feature should come out of the spec because otherwise, the spec is fiction. Well, one of the design principles of HTML5 is the Priority of Constituencies:
In case of conflict, consider users over authors over implementors over specifiers over theoretical purity.
That places us—authors—above browser makers. If we resolutely refuse to implement part of the HTML5 spec, then the spec becomes fiction.
Join me in a campaign of civil disobedience against the unnecessarily restrictive, backwards-incompatible change to the cite element. Start using HTML5 but start using it sensibly. Let’s ensure that bad advice remains fictitious.
Tantek has set up a page on the WHATWG wiki to document usage of the cite element for conversations. Please contribute to it.",2009,Jeremy Keith,jeremykeith,2009-12-11T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2009/incite-a-riot/,code
258,Mistletoe Offline,"It’s that time of year, when we gather together as families to celebrate the life of the greatest person in history. This man walked the Earth long before us, but he left behind words of wisdom. Those words can guide us every single day, but they are at the forefront of our minds during this special season.
I am, of course, talking about Murphy, and the golden rule he gave unto us:
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.
So true! I mean, that’s why we make sure we’ve got nice 404 pages. It’s not that we want people to ever get served a File Not Found message, but we acknowledge that, despite our best efforts, it’s bound to happen sometime. Murphy’s Law, innit?
But there are some Murphyesque situations where even your lovingly crafted 404 page won’t help. What if your web server is down? What if someone is trying to reach your site but they lose their internet connection? These are all things than can—and will—go wrong.
I guess there’s nothing we can do about those particular situations, right?
Wrong!
A service worker is a Murphy-battling technology that you can inject into a visitor’s device from your website. Once it’s installed, it can intercept any requests made to your domain. If anything goes wrong with a request—as is inevitable—you can provide instructions for the browser. That’s your opportunity to turn those server outage frowns upside down. Take those network connection lemons and make network connection lemonade.
If you’ve got a custom 404 page, why not make a custom offline page too?
Get your server in order
Step one is to make …actually, wait. There’s a step before that. Step zero. Get your site running on HTTPS, if it isn’t already. You won’t be able to use a service worker unless everything’s being served over HTTPS, which makes sense when you consider the awesome power that a service worker wields.
If you’re developing locally, service workers will work fine for localhost, even without HTTPS. But for a live site, HTTPS is a must.
Make an offline page
Alright, assuming your site is being served over HTTPS, then step one is to create an offline page. Make it as serious or as quirky as is appropriate for your particular brand. If the website is for a restaurant, maybe you could put the telephone number and address of the restaurant on the custom offline page (unsolicited advice: you could also put this on the home page, you know). Here’s an example of the custom offline page for this year’s Ampersand conference.
When you’re done, publish the offline page at suitably imaginative URL, like, say /offline.html.
Pre-cache your offline page
Now create a JavaScript file called serviceworker.js. This is the script that the browser will look to when certain events are triggered. The first event to handle is what to do when the service worker is installed on the user’s device. When that happens, an event called install is fired. You can listen out for this event using addEventListener:
addEventListener('install', installEvent => {
// put your instructions here.
}); // end addEventListener
In this case, you want to make sure that your lovingly crafted custom offline page is put into a nice safe cache. You can use the Cache API to do this. You get to create as many caches as you like, and you can call them whatever you want. Here, I’m going to call the cache Johnny just so I can refer to it as JohnnyCache in the code:
addEventListener('install', installEvent => {
installEvent.waitUntil(
caches.open('Johnny')
.then( JohnnyCache => {
JohnnyCache.addAll([
'/offline.html'
]); // end addAll
}) // end open.then
); // end waitUntil
}); // end addEventListener
I’m betting that your lovely offline page is linking to a CSS file, maybe an image or two, and perhaps some JavaScript. You can cache all of those at this point:
addEventListener('install', installEvent => {
installEvent.waitUntil(
caches.open('Johnny')
.then( JohnnyCache => {
JohnnyCache.addAll([
'/offline.html',
'/path/to/stylesheet.css',
'/path/to/javascript.js',
'/path/to/image.jpg'
]); // end addAll
}) // end open.then
); // end waitUntil
}); // end addEventListener
Make sure that the URLs are correct. If just one of the URLs in the list fails to resolve, none of the items in the list will be cached.
Intercept requests
The next event you want to listen for is the fetch event. This is probably the most powerful—and, let’s be honest, the creepiest—feature of a service worker. Once it has been installed, the service worker lurks on the user’s device, waiting for any requests made to your site. Every time the user requests a web page from your site, a fetch event will fire. Every time that page requests a style sheet or an image, a fetch event will fire. You can provide instructions for what should happen each time:
addEventListener('fetch', fetchEvent => {
// What happens next is up to you!
}); // end addEventListener
Let’s write a fairly conservative script with the following logic:
Whenever a file is requested,
First, try to fetch it from the network,
But if that doesn’t work, try to find it in the cache,
But if that doesn’t work, and it’s a request for a web page, show the custom offline page instead.
Here’s how that translates into JavaScript:
// Whenever a file is requested
addEventListener('fetch', fetchEvent => {
const request = fetchEvent.request;
fetchEvent.respondWith(
// First, try to fetch it from the network
fetch(request)
.then( responseFromFetch => {
return responseFromFetch;
}) // end fetch.then
// But if that doesn't work
.catch( fetchError => {
// try to find it in the cache
caches.match(request)
.then( responseFromCache => {
if (responseFromCache) {
return responseFromCache;
// But if that doesn't work
} else {
// and it's a request for a web page
if (request.headers.get('Accept').includes('text/html')) {
// show the custom offline page instead
return caches.match('/offline.html');
} // end if
} // end if/else
}) // end match.then
}) // end fetch.catch
); // end respondWith
}); // end addEventListener
I am fully aware that I may have done some owl-drawing there. If you need a more detailed breakdown of what’s happening at each point in the code, I’ve written a whole book for you. It’s the perfect present for Murphymas.
Hook up your service worker script
You can publish your service worker script at /serviceworker.js but you still need to tell the browser where to look for it. You can do that using JavaScript. Put this in an existing JavaScript file that you’re calling in to every page on your site, or add this in a script element at the end of every page’s HTML:
if (navigator.serviceWorker) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/serviceworker.js');
}
That tells the browser to start installing the service worker, but not without first checking that the browser understands what a service worker is. When it comes to JavaScript, feature detection is your friend.
You might already have some JavaScript files in a folder like /assets/js/ and you might be tempted to put your service worker script in there too. Don’t do that. If you do, the service worker will only be able to handle requests made to for files within /assets/js/. By putting the service worker script in the root directory, you’re making sure that every request can be intercepted.
Go further!
Nicely done! You’ve made sure that if—no, when—a visitor can’t reach your website, they’ll get your hand-tailored offline page. You have temporarily defeated the forces of chaos! You have briefly fought the tide of entropy! You have made a small but ultimately futile gesture against the inevitable heat-death of the universe!
This is just the beginning. You can do more with service workers.
What if, every time you fetched a page from the network, you stored a copy of that page in a cache? Then if that person tries to reach that page later, but they’re offline, you could show them the cached version.
Or, what if instead of reaching out the network first, you checked to see if a file is in the cache first? You could serve up that cached version—which would be blazingly fast—and still fetch a fresh version from the network in the background to pop in the cache for next time. That might be a good strategy for images.
So many options! The hard part isn’t writing the code, it’s figuring out the steps you want to take. Once you’ve got those steps written out, then it’s a matter of translating them into JavaScript.
Inevitably there will be some obstacles along the way—usually it’s a misplaced curly brace or a missing parenthesis. Don’t be too hard on yourself if your code doesn’t work at first. That’s just Murphy’s Law in action.",2018,Jeremy Keith,jeremykeith,2018-12-04T00:00:00+00:00,https://24ways.org/2018/mistletoe-offline/,code
280,Conditional Loading for Responsive Designs,"On the eighteenth day of last year’s 24 ways, Paul Hammond wrote a great article called Speed Up Your Site with Delayed Content. He outlined a technique for loading some content — like profile avatars — after the initial page load. This gives you a nice performance boost.
There’s another situation where this kind of delayed loading could be really handy: mobile-first responsive design.
Responsive design combines three techniques:
a fluid grid
flexible images
media queries
At first, responsive design was applied to existing desktop-centric websites to allow the layout to adapt to smaller screen sizes. But more recently it has been combined with another innovative approach called mobile first.
Rather then starting with the big, bloated desktop site and then scaling down for smaller devices, it makes more sense to start with the constraints of the small screen and then scale up for larger viewports. Using this approach, your layout grid, your large images and your media queries are applied on top of the pre-existing small-screen design. It’s taking progressive enhancement to the next level.
One of the great advantages of the mobile-first approach is that it forces you to really focus on the core content of your page. It might be more accurate to think of this as a content-first approach. You don’t have the luxury of sidebars or multiple columns to fill up with content that’s just nice to have rather than essential.
But what happens when you apply your media queries for larger viewports and you do have sidebars and multiple columns? Well, you can load in that nice-to-have content using the same kind of Ajax functionality that Paul described in his article last year. The difference is that you first run a quick test to see if the viewport is wide enough to accommodate the subsidiary content. This is conditional delayed loading.
Consider this situation: I’ve published an article about cats and I’d like to include relevant cat-related news items in the sidebar …but only if there’s enough room on the screen for a sidebar.
I’m going to use Google’s News API to return the search results. This is the ideal time to use delayed loading: I don’t want a third-party service slowing down the rendering of my page so I’m going to fire off the request after my document has loaded.
Here’s an example of the kind of Ajax function that I would write:
var searchNews = function(searchterm) {
var elem = document.createElement('script');
elem.src = 'http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/services/search/news?v=1.0&q='+searchterm+'&callback=displayNews';
document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(elem);
};
I’ve provided a callback function called displayNews that takes the JSON result of that Ajax request and adds it an element on the page with the ID newsresults:
var displayNews = function(news) {
var html = '',
items = news.responseData.results,
total = items.length;
if (total>0) {
for (var i=0; i';
html+= ''+item.titleNoFormatting+' ';
html+= '