{"rowid": 336, "title": "Practical Microformats with hCard", "contents": "You\u2019ve probably heard about microformats over the last few months. You may have even read the easily digestible introduction at Digital Web Magazine, but perhaps you\u2019ve not found time to actually implement much yet. That\u2019s understandable, as it can sometimes be difficult to see exactly what you\u2019re adding by applying a microformat to a page. Sure, you\u2019re semantically enhancing the information you\u2019re marking up, and the Semantic Web is a great idea and all, but what benefit is it right now, today? \n\nWell, the answer to that question is simple: you\u2019re adding lots of information that can be and is being used on the web here and now. The big ongoing battle amongst the big web companies if one of territory over information. Everyone\u2019s grasping for as much data as possible. Some of that information many of us are cautious to give away, but a lot of is happy to be freely available. Of the data you\u2019re giving away, it makes sense to give it as much meaning as possible, thus enabling anyone from your friends and family to the giant search company down the road to make the most of it.\n\nOk, enough of the waffle, let\u2019s get working.\n\nIntroducing hCard\n\nYou may have come across hCard. It\u2019s a microformat for describing contact information (or really address book information) from within your HTML. It\u2019s based on the vCard format, which is the format the contacts/address book program on your computer uses. All the usual fields are available \u2013 name, address, town, website, email, you name it.\n\nIf you\u2019re running Firefox and Greasemonkey (or if you can, just to try this out), install this user script. What it does is look for instances of the hCard microformat in a page, and then add in a link to pass any hCards it finds to a web service which will convert it to a vCard. Take a look at the About the author box at the bottom of this article. It\u2019s a hCard, so you should be able to click the icon the user script inserts and add me to your Outlook contacts or OS X Address Book with just a click.\n\nSo microformats are useful after all. Free microformats all round!\n\nImplementing hCard\n\nThis is the really easy bit. All the hCard microformat is, is a bunch of predefined class names that you apply to the markup you\u2019ve probably already got around your contact information. Let\u2019s take the example of the About the author box from this article. Here\u2019s how the markup looks without hCard:\n\n
Drew McLellan is a web developer, author and no-good swindler from \n just outside London, England. At the \n Web Standards Project he works \n on press, strategy and tools. Drew keeps a \n personal weblog covering web \n development issues and themes.
\nDrew McLellan is a web developer...\n\nThe two remaining items are my URL and the organisation I belong to. The class names designated for those are url and org respectively. As both of those items are links in this case, I can apply the classes to those links. So here\u2019s the finished hCard.\n\n
Drew McLellan is a web developer, author and \n no-good swindler from just outside London, England. \n At the Web Standards Project \n he works on press, strategy and tools. Drew keeps a \n personal weblog covering web \n development issues and themes.
\nYour postal/zip code was not in the correct format.
\nYour postal/zip code was not in the correct format.
\nSidebar content here
\nYour main content goes here.
\nLorem ipsum etc. etc. etc.
\n\u201cSpeech marks. Curly quotes. That annoying thing cool people do with their fingers to emphasize a buzzword, shortly before you hit them.\u201d\n\nSo far nothing will look any different, aside form the curlies looking a bit nicer. I know we\u2019ve just added extra markup, but the benefits as far as accessibility are concerned are good enough for me, and of course there are no images to download.\n\nThe CSS\n\nOK, easy stuff first. Our first rule .bqstart floats the span left, changes the color, and whacks the font-size up to an exuberant 700%. Our second rule .bqend does the same tricks aside from floating the curly to the right.\n\n.bqstart {\n float: left;\n font-size: 700%;\n color: #FF0000;\n }\n\n .bqend {\n float: right;\n font-size: 700%;\n color: #FF0000;\n }\n\nThat gives us this, which is rubbish. I\u2019ve highlighted the actual span area with outlines:\n\n\n\nNote that the curlies don\u2019t even fit inside the span! At this stage on IE 6 PC you won\u2019t even see the quotes, as it only places focus on what it thinks is in the div. Also, the quote text is getting all spangled.\n\nFiddle with margin and padding\n\nThink of that span outline box as a window, and that you need to position the curlies within that window in order to see them. By adding some small adjustments to the margin and padding it\u2019s possible to position the curlies exactly where you want them, and remove the excess white space by defining a height:\n\n.bqstart {\n float: left;\n height: 45px;\n margin-top: -20px;\n padding-top: 45px;\n margin-bottom: -50px;\n font-size: 700%;\n color: #FF0000;\n }\n\n .bqend {\n float: right;\n height: 25px;\n margin-top: 0px;\n padding-top: 45px;\n font-size: 700%;\n color: #FF0000;\n }\n\nI wanted the blocks of my curlies to align with the quote text, whereas you may want them to dig in or stick out more. Be aware however that my positioning works for IE PC and Mac, Firefox and Safari. Too much tweaking seems to break the magic in various browsers at various times. Now things are fitting beautifully:\n\nI must admit that the heights, margins and spacing don\u2019t make a lot of sense if you analyze them. This was a real trial and error job. Get it working on Safari, and IE would fail. Sort IE, and Firefox would go weird.\n\nFinished\n\nThe final thing looks ace, can be resized, looks cool without styles, and can be edited with CSS at any time. Here\u2019s a real example (note that I\u2019m specifying Lucida Grande and then Verdana for my curlies):\n\n \u201cSpeech marks. Curly quotes. That annoying thing cool people do with their fingers to emphasize a buzzword, shortly before you hit them.\u201d\n\nBrowsers happy\n\nAs I said, too much tweaking of margins and padding can break the effect in some browsers. Even now, Firefox insists on dropping the closing curly by approximately 6 or 7 pixels, and if I adjust the padding for that, it\u2019ll crush it into the text on Safari or IE. Weird. Still, as I close now it seems solid through resizing tests on Safari, Firefox, Camino, Opera and IE PC and Mac. Lovely.\n\nIt\u2019s probably not perfect, but together we can beat the evil typographic limitations of the web and walk together towards a brighter, more aligned world. Merry Christmas.", "year": "2005", "author": "Simon Collison", "author_slug": "simoncollison", "published": "2005-12-21T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2005/swooshy-curly-quotes-without-images/", "topic": "business"} {"rowid": 327, "title": "Improving Form Accessibility with DOM Scripting", "contents": "The form label element is an incredibly useful little element \u2013 it lets you link the form field unquestionably with the descriptive label text that sits alongside or above it. This is a very useful feature for people using screen readers, but there are some problems with this element.\n\nWhat happens if you have one piece of data that, for various reasons (validation, the way your data is collected/stored etc), needs to be collected using several form elements?\n\nThe classic example is date of birth \u2013 ideally, you\u2019ll ask for the date of birth once but you may have three inputs, one each for day, month and year, that you also need to provide hints about the format required. The problem is that to be truly accessible you need to label each field. So you end up needing something to say \u201cthis is a date of birth\u201d, \u201cthis is the day field\u201d, \u201cthis is the month field\u201d and \u201cthis is the day field\u201d. Seems like overkill, doesn\u2019t it? And it can uglify a form no end.\n\nThere are various ways that you can approach it (and I think I\u2019ve seen them all). Some people omit the label and rely on the title attribute to help the user through; others put text in a label but make the text 1 pixel high and merging in to the background so that screen readers can still get that information. The most common method, though, is simply to set the label to not display at all using the CSS display:none property/value pairing (a technique which, for the time being, seems to work on most screen readers). But perhaps we can do more with this?\n\nThe technique I am suggesting as another alternative is as follows (here comes the pseudo-code):\n\n\n\tStart with a totally valid and accessible form\n\tEnsure that each form input has a label that is linked to its related form control\n\tApply a class to any label that you don\u2019t want to be visible (for example superfluous)\n\n\nThen, through the magic of unobtrusive JavaScript/the DOM, manipulate the page as follows once the page has loaded:\n\n\n\tFind all the label elements that are marked as superfluous and hide them\n\tFind out what input element each of these label elements is related to\n\tThen apply a hint about formatting required for input (gleaned from the original, now-hidden label text) \u2013 add it to the form input as default text\n\tFinally, add in a behaviour that clears or selects the default text (as you choose)\n\n\nSo, here\u2019s the theory put into practice \u2013 a date of birth, grouped using a fieldset, and with the behaviours added in using DOM, and here\u2019s the JavaScript that does the heavy lifting. \n\nBut why not just use display:none? As demonstrated at Juicy Studio, display:none seems to work quite well for hiding label elements. So why use a sledge hammer to crack a nut? In all honesty, this is something of an experiment, but consider the following:\n\n\n\tUsing the DOM, you can add extra levels of help, potentially across a whole form \u2013 or even range of forms \u2013 without necessarily increasing your markup (it goes beyond simply hiding labels)\n\tScreen readers today may identify a label that is set not to display, but they may not in the future \u2013 this might provide a way around\n\tBy expanding this technique above, it might be possible to visually change the parent container that groups these items \u2013 in this case, a fieldset and legend, which are notoriously difficult to style consistently across different browsers \u2013 while still retaining the underlying semantic/logical structure\n\n\nWell, it\u2019s an idea to think about at least. How is it for you? How else might you use DOM scripting to improve the accessiblity or usability of your forms?", "year": "2005", "author": "Ian Lloyd", "author_slug": "ianlloyd", "published": "2005-12-03T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2005/improving-form-accessibility-with-dom-scripting/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 326, "title": "Don't be eval()", "contents": "JavaScript is an interpreted language, and like so many of its peers it includes the all powerful eval() function. eval() takes a string and executes it as if it were regular JavaScript code. It\u2019s incredibly powerful and incredibly easy to abuse in ways that make your code slower and harder to maintain. As a general rule, if you\u2019re using eval() there\u2019s probably something wrong with your design.\n\nCommon mistakes\n\nHere\u2019s the classic misuse of eval(). You have a JavaScript object, foo, and you want to access a property on it \u2013 but you don\u2019t know the name of the property until runtime. Here\u2019s how NOT to do it:\n\nvar property = 'bar';\nvar value = eval('foo.' + property);\n\nYes it will work, but every time that piece of code runs JavaScript will have to kick back in to interpreter mode, slowing down your app. It\u2019s also dirt ugly.\n\nHere\u2019s the right way of doing the above:\n\nvar property = 'bar';\nvar value = foo[property];\n\nIn JavaScript, square brackets act as an alternative to lookups using a dot. The only difference is that square bracket syntax expects a string.\n\nSecurity issues\n\nIn any programming language you should be extremely cautious of executing code from an untrusted source. The same is true for JavaScript \u2013 you should be extremely cautious of running eval() against any code that may have been tampered with \u2013 for example, strings taken from the page query string. Executing untrusted code can leave you vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.\n\nWhat\u2019s it good for?\n\nSome programmers say that eval() is B.A.D. \u2013 Broken As Designed \u2013 and should be removed from the language. However, there are some places in which it can dramatically simplify your code. A great example is for use with XMLHttpRequest, a component of the set of tools more popularly known as Ajax. XMLHttpRequest lets you make a call back to the server from JavaScript without refreshing the whole page. A simple way of using this is to have the server return JavaScript code which is then passed to eval(). Here is a simple function for doing exactly that \u2013 it takes the URL to some JavaScript code (or a server-side script that produces JavaScript) and loads and executes that code using XMLHttpRequest and eval().\n\nfunction evalRequest(url) {\n var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();\n xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {\n if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) {\n eval(xmlhttp.responseText);\n }\n }\n xmlhttp.open(\"GET\", url, true);\n xmlhttp.send(null);\n }\n\nIf you want this to work with Internet Explorer you\u2019ll need to include this compatibility patch.", "year": "2005", "author": "Simon Willison", "author_slug": "simonwillison", "published": "2005-12-07T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2005/dont-be-eval/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 325, "title": "\"Z's not dead baby, Z's not dead\"", "contents": "While Mr. Moll and Mr. Budd have pipped me to the post with their predictions for 2006, I\u2019m sure they won\u2019t mind if I sneak in another. The use of positioning together with z-index will be one of next year\u2019s hot techniques \n\nBoth has been a little out of favour recently. For many, positioned layouts made way for the flexibility of floats. Developers I speak to often associate z-index with Dreamweaver\u2019s layers feature. But in combination with alpha transparency support for PNG images in IE7 and full implementation of position property values, the stacking of elements with z-index is going to be big. I\u2019m going to cover the basics of z-index and how it can be used to create designs which \u2018break out of the box\u2019.\n\nNo positioning? No Z!\n\nRemember geometry? The x axis represents the horizontal, the y axis represents the vertical. The z axis, which is where we get the z-index, represents /depth/. Elements which are stacked using z-index are stacked from front to back and z-index is only applied to elements which have their position property set to relative or absolute. No positioning, no z-index. Z-index values can be either negative or positive and it is the element with the highest z-index value appears closest to the viewer, regardless of its order in the source. Furthermore, if more than one element are given the same z-index, the element which comes last in source order comes out top of the pile. \n\nLet\u2019s take three
and, all inside a branding
which acts a new positioning context. By enclosing them inside a positioned parent, we establish a new stacking order which is independent of either the root element or other positioning contexts on the page.\n\n\n\n\nApplying a little positioning and z-index magic we can both set the position of these elements inside their positioning context and their stacking order. As we are going to use background images made from transparent PNGs, each element will allow another further down the stacking order to show through. This makes for some novel effects, particularly in liquid layouts.\n\n(Ed: We\u2019re using n below to represent whatever values you require for your specific design.) \n\n#branding {\n position: relative;\n width: n;\n height: n;\n background-image: url(n);\n }\n\n #branding>h1 {\n position: absolute;\n left: n;\n top: n;\n width: n;\n height: n;\n background-image: url(h1.png);\n text-indent: n;\n }\n\n #branding>blockquote {\n position: absolute;\n left: n;\n top: n;\n width: n;\n height: n;\n background-image: url(bq.png);\n text-indent: n;\n\n }\n\n #branding>p {\n position: absolute;\n right: n;\n top: n;\n width: n;\n height: n;\n background-image: url(p.png);\n text-indent: n;\n }\n\nNext we can begin to see how the three elements build upon each other.\n\n\n1. Elements outlined\n\n\n2. Positioned elements overlayed to show context\n\n\n3. Our final result\n\nMultiple stacking orders\n\nNot only can elements within a positioning context be given a z-index, but those positioning contexts themselves can also be stacked.\n\n\nTwo positioning contexts, each with their own stacking order\n\nInterestingly each stacking order is independent of that of either the root element or its siblings and we can exploit this to make complex layouts from just a few semantic elements. This technique was used heavily on my recent redesign of Karova.com.\n\nDissecting part of Karova.com\n\nFirst the XHTML. The default template markup used for the site placesWorrysome.com
\n\nDon' worry 'bout a thing...
Take the weight of the world off your shoulders.
\n