{"rowid": 76, "title": "Giving CSS Animations and Transitions Their Place", "contents": "CSS animations and transitions may not sit squarely in the realm of the behaviour layer, but they\u2019re stepping up into this area that used to be pure JavaScript territory. Heck, CSS might even perform better than its JavaScript equivalents in some cases. That\u2019s pretty serious! With CSS\u2019s new tricks blurring the lines between presentation and behaviour, it can start to feel bloated and messy in our CSS files. It\u2019s an uncomfortable feeling.\n\nHere are a pair of methods I\u2019ve found to be pretty helpful in keeping the potential bloat and wire-crossing under control when CSS has its hands in both presentation and behaviour.\n\nSame eggs, more baskets\n\nStructuring your CSS to have separate files for layout, typography, grids, and so on is a fairly common approach these days. But which one do you put your transitions and animations in? The initial answer, as always, is \u201cit depends\u201d.\n\nSmall effects here and there will likely sit just fine with your other styles. When you move into more involved effects that require multiple animations and some logic support from JavaScript, it\u2019s probably time to choose none of the above, and create a separate CSS file just for them.\n\nPutting all your animations in one file is a huge help for code organization. Even if you opt for a name less literal than animations.css, you\u2019ll know exactly where to go for anything CSS animation related. That saves time and effort when it comes to editing and maintenance. Keeping track of which animations are still currently used is easier when they\u2019re all grouped together as well. And as an added bonus, you won\u2019t have to look at all those horribly unattractive and repetitive prefixed @-keyframe rules unless you actually need to.\n\nAn animations.css file might look something like the snippet below. It defines each animation\u2019s keyframes and defines a class for each variation of that animation you\u2019ll be using. Depending on the situation, you may also want to include transitions here in a similar way. (I\u2019ve found defining transitions as their own class, or mixin, to be a huge help in past projects for me.)\n\n// defining the animation\n@keyframes catFall {\n from { background-position: center 0;}\n to {background-position: center 1000px;}\n}\n@-webkit-keyframes catFall {\n from { background-position: center 0;}\n to {background-position: center 1000px;}\n}\n@-moz-keyframes catFall {\n from { background-position: center 0;}\n to {background-position: center 1000px;}\n}\n@-ms-keyframes catFall {\n from { background-position: center 0;}\n to {background-position: center 1000px;}\n}\n\n\u2026\n\n// class that assigns the animation\n\n.catsBackground {\n height: 100%;\n background: transparent url(../endlessKittens.png) 0 0 repeat-y;\n animation: catFall 1s linear infinite;\n -webkit-animation: catFall 1s linear infinite;\n -moz-animation: catFall 1s linear infinite;\n -ms-animation: catFall 1s linear infinite;\n}\n\nIf we don\u2019t need it, why load it?\n\nHaving all those CSS animations and transitions in one file gives us the added flexibility to load them only when we want to. Loading a whole lot of things that will never be used might seem like a bit of a waste.\n\nWhile CSS has us impressed with its motion chops, it falls flat when it comes to the logic and fine-grained control. JavaScript, on the other hand, is pretty good at both those things. Chances are the content of your animations.css file isn\u2019t acting alone. You\u2019ll likely be adding and removing classes via JavaScript to manage your CSS animations at the very least. If your CSS animations are so entwined with JavaScript, why not let them hang out with the rest of the behaviour layer and only come out to play when JavaScript is supported?\n\nDynamically linking your animations.css file like this means it will be completely ignored if JavaScript is off or not supported. No JavaScript? No additional behaviour, not even the parts handled by CSS.\n\n\n\nThis technique comes up in progressive enhancement techniques as well, but it can help here to keep your presentation and behaviour nicely separated when more than one language is involved. The aim in both cases is to avoid loading files we won\u2019t be using.\n\nIf you happen to be doing something a bit fancier \u2013 like 3-D transforms or critical animations that require more nuanced fallbacks \u2013 you might need something like modernizr to step in to determine support more specifically. But the general idea is the same.\n\nSumming it all up\n\nUsing a couple of simple techniques like these, we get to pick where to best draw the line between behaviour and presentation based on the situation at hand, not just on what language we\u2019re using. The power of when to separate and how to reassemble the individual pieces can be even greater if you use preprocessors as part of your process. We\u2019ve got a lot of options! The important part is to make forward-thinking choices to save your future self, and even your current self, unnecessary headaches.", "year": "2012", "author": "Val Head", "author_slug": "valhead", "published": "2012-12-08T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2012/giving-css-animations-and-transitions-their-place/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 175, "title": "Front-End Code Reusability with CSS and JavaScript", "contents": "Most web standards-based developers are more than familiar with creating their sites with semantic HTML with lots and lots of CSS. With each new page in a design, the CSS tends to grow and grow and more elements and styles are added. But CSS can be used to better effect.\n\nThe idea of object-oriented CSS isn\u2019t new. Nicole Sullivan has written a presentation on the subject and outlines two main concepts: separate structure and visual design; and separate container and content. Jeff Croft talks about Applying OOP Concepts to CSS:\n\n\n\tI can make a class of .box that defines some basic layout structure, and another class of .rounded that provides rounded corners, and classes of .wide and .narrow that define some widths, and then easily create boxes of varying widths and styles by assigning multiple classes to an element, without having to duplicate code in my CSS.\n\n\nThis concept helps reduce CSS file size, allows for great flexibility, rapid building of similar content areas and means greater consistency throughout the entire design. You can also take this concept one step further and apply it to site behaviour with JavaScript.\n\nBuild a versatile slideshow\n\nI will show you how to build multiple slideshows using jQuery, allowing varying levels of functionality which you may find on one site design. The code will be flexible enough to allow you to add previous/next links, image pagination and the ability to change the animation type. More importantly, it will allow you to apply any combination of these features.\n\nImage galleries are simply a list of images, so the obvious choice of marking the content up is to use a